*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** I was wondering if anybody can explain what qualitative difference exist, if any, between different brands of plain glass slides. For example, over on the Ted Pella page ( http://www.tedpella.com/histo_html/slides.htm ), for a 2-box pack of 144 slides, the price varies from about $10 for the Pella Economy Slides, all the way up to $40 or $60+ for Gold Seal or Corning slides. My question is, is there any advantage or optical difference with the more expensive slides? Corning advertises theirs as "water white" glass, which I imagine implies something about the transmittance or refractive index, but I'm not sure. |
Axel Kurt Preuss |
Dear Peter
It's all about the ions in the glass and relative composition of it's components I'm on a trip but when I ve time I post a link Thanks Cheers Axel ————— Axel K Preuss, PhD, Central Imaging, IMCB, A*Star, 61 Biopolis Dr, 6-19B, Singapore 138673, sent from 9271.5622 On Dec 12, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Peter Werner <[hidden email]> wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > I was wondering if anybody can explain what qualitative difference > exist, if any, between different brands of plain glass slides. For > example, over on the Ted Pella page ( http://www.tedpella.com/histo_html/slides.htm > ), for a 2-box pack of 144 slides, the price varies from about $10 > for the Pella Economy Slides, all the way up to $40 or $60+ for Gold > Seal or Corning slides. > > My question is, is there any advantage or optical difference with the > more expensive slides? Corning advertises theirs as "water white" > glass, which I imagine implies something about the transmittance or > refractive index, but I'm not sure. Note: This message may contain confidential information. If this Email/Fax has been sent to you by mistake, please notify the sender and delete it immediately. Thank you. |
In reply to this post by Peter Werner
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** If you go to www.proscitech.com.au (no connection) you'll find it all explained. Differences are such things as colour, flatness, precision and lack of autofluorescence. You need to be doing very demanding work for it to make a difference, but it's nice to know the expensive ones are there when you need them. Guy Optical Imaging Techniques in Cell Biology by Guy Cox CRC Press / Taylor & Francis http://www.guycox.com/optical.htm ______________________________________________ Associate Professor Guy Cox, MA, DPhil(Oxon) Australian Centre for Microscopy & Microanalysis, Madsen Building F09, University of Sydney, NSW 2006 Phone +61 2 9351 3176 Fax +61 2 9351 7682 Mobile 0413 281 861 ______________________________________________ http://www.guycox.net -----Original Message----- From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Peter Werner Sent: Sunday, 12 December 2010 6:18 PM To: [hidden email] Subject: Brands of plain glass slides ***** To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** I was wondering if anybody can explain what qualitative difference exist, if any, between different brands of plain glass slides. For example, over on the Ted Pella page ( http://www.tedpella.com/histo_html/slides.htm ), for a 2-box pack of 144 slides, the price varies from about $10 for the Pella Economy Slides, all the way up to $40 or $60+ for Gold Seal or Corning slides. My question is, is there any advantage or optical difference with the more expensive slides? Corning advertises theirs as "water white" glass, which I imagine implies something about the transmittance or refractive index, but I'm not sure. |
Michael Bastiani |
In reply to this post by Peter Werner
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** While you're on the topic of cover glasses, I am wondering if people have suggestions for economy brands that consistently give "clean" products. I have been disappointed by the glass chips (50-100um) that are dusted over the surface of many brands. thanks, michael |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |