Dolphin, Colin |
I'm putting together a grant application to establish a small, but I hope, effective Imaging Facility. We are asking for a Leica SP2, that we already have, to be ‘recomissioned’ (hasn’t been serviced for several years) and to be upgraded to MP capability, a Deltavision core system, laser dissection, two widefield systems and a manager’s salary for 3 yrs. From talking with others it would appear that most users of such facilities bring their own consumables but I guess it would be useful to ask for some running costs on the grant application. I have no real idea of what internal consumables such a facility might require and/or how much to ask for per year. Could someone suggest some appropriate consumables and costs? Many thanks Colin |
Boswell, Carl A - (cboswell) |
Hi Colin,
Interestingly, and to my surprise, objectives can
be considered consumable. I had to have our 63x Zeiss objective reworked
(~$2800)after having oil leak into it, and Zeiss was not interested in covering
it under the service agreement. Other than that, Hg lamps, immersion
medium, lens cleaner, cotton swabs, lens tissue, lab tissues and a
couple of commercial slides for testing and calibration are the expenses for the
multiple system I oversee. Maybe a stash of slides and coverslips for
those who come umprepared might be useful also. As you say, most users
supply their own consumables.
Cheers,
carl
Carl A. Boswell, Ph.D.
Molecular and Cellular Biology University of Arizona 520-954-7053 FAX 520-621-3709
|
Glen MacDonald-2 |
Hi Colin,
Carl covered the majority of the consumable costs. Some software may have service contracts, as well, to cover major updates and tech support. I second the need for a budget to cover repairs to lenses, maybe scope cleaning. Don't overlook tools (screw drivers, forceps, wrenches, etc.). voltmeter, light meter, maybe some additional immersion oils of varying RI, some small lamps for work lights and a vacuum cleaner with a HEPA filter. A small budget for upgrades to scopes and computers, if you can get away with it. A spindle of CD-R and DVD-R may assist those who forget their disks. Are you using nitrogen bottles for the air tables or installing a system for cleaned house air? My 2 cents, Glen On Nov 14, 2008, at 8:58 AM, Carl Boswell wrote: > Hi Colin, > Interestingly, and to my surprise, objectives can be considered > consumable. I had to have our 63x Zeiss objective reworked (~ > $2800)after having oil leak into it, and Zeiss was not interested in > covering it under the service agreement. Other than that, Hg lamps, > immersion medium, lens cleaner, cotton swabs, lens tissue, lab > tissues and a couple of commercial slides for testing and > calibration are the expenses for the multiple system I oversee. > Maybe a stash of slides and coverslips for those who come umprepared > might be useful also. As you say, most users supply their own > consumables. > Cheers, > carl > > Carl A. Boswell, Ph.D. > Molecular and Cellular Biology > University of Arizona > 520-954-7053 > FAX 520-621-3709 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Dolphin, Colin > To: [hidden email] > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:48 AM > Subject: Consumables for grant application > > Hi > > I'm putting together a grant application to establish a small, but I > hope, effective Imaging Facility. We are asking for a Leica SP2, > that we already have, to be ‘recomissioned’ (hasn’t been serviced > for several years) and to be upgraded to MP capability, a > Deltavision core system, laser dissection, two widefield systems and > a manager’s salary for 3 yrs. From talking with others it would > appear that most users of such facilities bring their own > consumables but I guess it would be useful to ask for some running > costs on the grant application. I have no real idea of what internal > consumables such a facility might require and/or how much to ask for > per year. Could someone suggest some appropriate consumables and > costs? > > Many thanks > > Colin |
Dear List,
I would greatly appreciate if you could share your experience working with the orange-red fluorescent proteins with the excitation max from >560 nm. I have noticed that both mCherry and mStrawberry fusion proteins have tendency to aggregate in association with membranes, and are clearly more cytotoxic than CeFP, YFP (or venusYFP), tested as fusions with a relatively large numbers of proteins (>10), predominantly membrane proteins. Would you know: which protein among mRFP1 derivatives (or other REDs) is the most soluble in vitro/in vivo? Thank you very much in advance, Vitaly NCI-Frederick, 301-846-6575 |
Rosemary.White |
In reply to this post by Glen MacDonald-2
Hi Colin,
The only thing I'd add to what Carl and Glen have covered is a service contract or extended warranty on the confocal. We've had a full extended warranty on our SP2 since purchase in 2000, and it has covered replacement of two lasers, a motherboard in the scanhead, motorized stage, several x-galvos (when they went through a flakey stage), other minor glitches and annual maintenance visits. The systems may be more stable now, but we think this was well worth it. my 1c (2 Aussie c) Rosemary On 15/11/08 4:27 AM, "Glen MacDonald" <[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi Colin, > Carl covered the majority of the consumable costs. Some software may > have service contracts, as well, to cover major updates and tech > support. I second the need for a budget to cover repairs to lenses, > maybe scope cleaning. Don't overlook tools (screw drivers, forceps, > wrenches, etc.). voltmeter, light meter, maybe some additional > immersion oils of varying RI, some small lamps for work lights and a > vacuum cleaner with a HEPA filter. A small budget for upgrades to > scopes and computers, if you can get away with it. A spindle of CD-R > and DVD-R may assist those who forget their disks. Are you using > nitrogen bottles for the air tables or installing a system for cleaned > house air? > > My 2 cents, > Glen > > > On Nov 14, 2008, at 8:58 AM, Carl Boswell wrote: > >> Hi Colin, >> Interestingly, and to my surprise, objectives can be considered >> consumable. I had to have our 63x Zeiss objective reworked (~ >> $2800)after having oil leak into it, and Zeiss was not interested in >> covering it under the service agreement. Other than that, Hg lamps, >> immersion medium, lens cleaner, cotton swabs, lens tissue, lab >> tissues and a couple of commercial slides for testing and >> calibration are the expenses for the multiple system I oversee. >> Maybe a stash of slides and coverslips for those who come umprepared >> might be useful also. As you say, most users supply their own >> consumables. >> Cheers, >> carl >> >> Carl A. Boswell, Ph.D. >> Molecular and Cellular Biology >> University of Arizona >> 520-954-7053 >> FAX 520-621-3709 >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Dolphin, Colin >> To: [hidden email] >> Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:48 AM >> Subject: Consumables for grant application >> >> Hi >> >> I'm putting together a grant application to establish a small, but I >> hope, effective Imaging Facility. We are asking for a Leica SP2, >> that we already have, to be recomissioned¹ (hasn¹t been serviced >> for several years) and to be upgraded to MP capability, a >> Deltavision core system, laser dissection, two widefield systems and >> a manager¹s salary for 3 yrs. From talking with others it would >> appear that most users of such facilities bring their own >> consumables but I guess it would be useful to ask for some running >> costs on the grant application. I have no real idea of what internal >> consumables such a facility might require and/or how much to ask for >> per year. Could someone suggest some appropriate consumables and >> costs? >> >> Many thanks >> >> Colin |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |