Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Hey, this site is kinda new to me but was recommended by technical support at Cairn Research who provide our equipment for fluorescence measurements. I have a query that hopefully somebody might be able to help with. We are about to submit a paper where we record DAF-2 fluorescence from the epicaridal surface of an isolated heart, to monitor the level of nitric oxide. We collect excitation wavelengths of 470 / 480 / 490 / 500 nm at 535 nm through a band pass filter of 50 nm using a bifurcated light guide (Cairn Research). The help we require is as follows: After we have obtained a stable level of background autofluorescence at the start of the experiment, we inject the dye into the solution perfusing the heart. We continually monitor epicardial (from the surface of the heart) fluorescence and observe a rapid and dramatic DECREASE in the ongoing fluorescence signal. Inititally and as with other dyes (Fura and Indo for calcium detection), that we have used we expected a gradual increase in fluorescnence to be seen as the dye is cleaved and begins to fluoresce in the presence of NO. We have searched the literature and can not explain why we find a decrease in DAF-2 fluorescence immediately after we load the dye into the isolated heart. We are confident we are monitoring NO as premilinary experiments have indicated this (eg Increase in fluorescence with NO donors and decrease in fluorescence with blockers of endogenous NO activity. Can anybody help shed any light on this matter??? Yours truely Kieran [hidden email] (University of Leicester, UK) |
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
-
Kieran, I am not sure whether this applies to your specific situation, but we had people who used to label cells by loading them with a mitochondria fluorescent tracker. They saw the same effect: reduced fluorescence, when they expected increased fluorescence. The problem turned out to be quenching due to a dye overdose. When they reduced the concentration of the dye by 100-1000x, then things worked as expected. You could try to use a dilution series of your dye. If that doesn't solve the problem, then it's something else.
-- Julio Vazquez, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Seattle, WA 98109-1024 On Aug 10, 2007, at 8:42 AM, Dr Kieran Brack wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |