*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Dear all, I was trying to write code for FCS analysis in Matlab, but noticed that computing the ACF directly is computationally very expensive. I've read papers about the math needed to make the problem computationally efficient, but not intending to develop new FCS methods I am not that keen committing too much time into that. Does anyone have Matlab code for FCS analysis. If you have a toolbox great, if you have just the optimized functions to compute the correlation functions for FCS and FCCS, it will be anyway VERY helpful. Cheers, Alessandro www.quantitative-microscopy.org |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Have you looked at this? (I found it with google) http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/22358 Cheers On 14/06/2011, at 12:27 PM, Alessandro Esposito wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > Dear all, > I was trying to write code for FCS analysis in Matlab, but noticed that > computing the ACF directly is computationally very expensive. I've read papers > about the math needed to make the problem computationally efficient, but not > intending to develop new FCS methods I am not that keen committing too much > time into that. > > Does anyone have Matlab code for FCS analysis. If you have a toolbox great, if > you have just the optimized functions to compute the correlation functions for > FCS and FCCS, it will be anyway VERY helpful. > > Cheers, > > Alessandro > www.quantitative-microscopy.org |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** It's been a while since I used matlab, but the other classic way to speed up correlation is to use FFTs - ie: corr = ifftshift(real(ifft(fft(x)*fft(flipud(x))))) you can also replace fft(flipud(x)) with ifft(x) (subject to normalisation), which will avoid a couple of memory allocations. this method should be significantly faster (O(nlogn)) than a standard correlation (O(n^2)), but you might need to mess around a bit with normalisation and cut out just the bit of the curve corresponding to +ve lags. I have a funny feeling that this might already be available as a function (potentially called fftcorr), but can't be sure. cheers, David ----- Original Message ----LISTS.UMN.EDU Sent: Wed, 15 June, 2011 1:08:38 AM Subject: Re: FCS - Matlab code ***** To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Have you looked at this? (I found it with google) http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/22358 Cheers On 14/06/2011, at 12:27 PM, Alessandro Esposito wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > Dear all, > I was trying to write code for FCS analysis in Matlab, but noticed that > computing the ACF directly is computationally very expensive. I've read papers > about the math needed to make the problem computationally efficient, but not > intending to develop new FCS methods I am not that keen committing too much > time into that. > > Does anyone have Matlab code for FCS analysis. If you have a toolbox great, if > you have just the optimized functions to compute the correlation functions for > FCS and FCCS, it will be anyway VERY helpful. > > Cheers, > > Alessandro > www.quantitative-microscopy.org |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** One of my students wrote a C program a few years ago which did autocorrelation (I think using a 'multiple Tau' algorithm), taking data from a digital counter, and was reasonably fast. If you are interested, please contact me off the list. Sudipta On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:40:26 -0700, David Baddeley wrote > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > It's been a while since I used matlab, but the other classic way to > speed up correlation is to use FFTs - ie: corr = > ifftshift(real(ifft(fft(x)*fft(flipud(x))))) > > you can also replace fft(flipud(x)) with ifft(x) (subject to > normalisation), which will avoid a couple of memory allocations. > > this method should be significantly faster (O(nlogn)) than a > standard correlation (O(n^2)), but you might need to mess around a > bit with normalisation and cut out just the bit of the curve > corresponding to +ve lags. > > I have a funny feeling that this might already be available as a > function > (potentially called fftcorr), but can't be sure. > > cheers, > David > > ----- Original Message ----LISTS.UMN.EDU > Sent: Wed, 15 June, 2011 1:08:38 AM > Subject: Re: FCS - Matlab code > > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > Have you looked at this? (I found it with google) > > http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/22358 > > Cheers > On 14/06/2011, at 12:27 PM, Alessandro Esposito wrote: > > > ***** > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > ***** > > > > Dear all, > > I was trying to write code for FCS analysis in Matlab, but noticed that > > computing the ACF directly is computationally very expensive. I've read > > > about the math needed to make the problem computationally efficient, but not > > intending to develop new FCS methods I am not that keen committing too much > > time into that. > > > > Does anyone have Matlab code for FCS analysis. If you have a toolbox great, if > > > you have just the optimized functions to compute the correlation functions for > > > FCS and FCCS, it will be anyway VERY helpful. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Alessandro > > www.quantitative-microscopy.org Dr. Sudipta Maiti Associate Professor Dept. of Chemical Sciences Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Raod, Colaba, Mumbai 400005 Ph. 91-22-2278-2716 / 2539 Fax: 91-22-2280-4610 alternate e-mail: [hidden email] url: biophotonics.wetpaint.com |
Sudipta Maiti |
In reply to this post by David Baddeley
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Forgot to mention, there are also real-time hardware correlators available from Correlator.com (no financial interest) for about $2K without drivers. We have developed a LabView driver for it that does control / display / on line fitting of the FCS curve to various simple models etc. The driver is available free from us as a LabView executable (LabView not required on your PC). We also have a separate Maximum Entropy based FCS fitting routine (MEMFCS) for continuous distributions (described in Sengupta et al., Biophys. J., vol. 84, 2003, 1977) - again available free. Sudipta On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:40:26 -0700, David Baddeley wrote > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > It's been a while since I used matlab, but the other classic way to > speed up correlation is to use FFTs - ie: corr = > ifftshift(real(ifft(fft(x)*fft(flipud(x))))) > > you can also replace fft(flipud(x)) with ifft(x) (subject to > normalisation), which will avoid a couple of memory allocations. > > this method should be significantly faster (O(nlogn)) than a > standard correlation (O(n^2)), but you might need to mess around a > bit with normalisation and cut out just the bit of the curve > corresponding to +ve lags. > > I have a funny feeling that this might already be available as a > function > (potentially called fftcorr), but can't be sure. > > cheers, > David > > ----- Original Message ----LISTS.UMN.EDU > Sent: Wed, 15 June, 2011 1:08:38 AM > Subject: Re: FCS - Matlab code > > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > ***** > > Have you looked at this? (I found it with google) > > http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/22358 > > Cheers > On 14/06/2011, at 12:27 PM, Alessandro Esposito wrote: > > > ***** > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > ***** > > > > Dear all, > > I was trying to write code for FCS analysis in Matlab, but noticed that > > computing the ACF directly is computationally very expensive. I've read > > > about the math needed to make the problem computationally efficient, but not > > intending to develop new FCS methods I am not that keen committing too much > > time into that. > > > > Does anyone have Matlab code for FCS analysis. If you have a toolbox great, if > > > you have just the optimized functions to compute the correlation functions for > > > FCS and FCCS, it will be anyway VERY helpful. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Alessandro > > www.quantitative-microscopy.org Dr. Sudipta Maiti Associate Professor Dept. of Chemical Sciences Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Homi Bhabha Raod, Colaba, Mumbai 400005 Ph. 91-22-2278-2716 / 2539 Fax: 91-22-2280-4610 alternate e-mail: [hidden email] url: biophotonics.wetpaint.com |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |