Boswell, Carl A - (cboswell) |
Hi all,
I have a user who wants to measure the volume, not intensity, of the FISH-labeled region in a z-series. Any issues with the following proposal, besides using a histogram to get pixel numbers? 1. Threshold the FISH signals for control and experimental Z-Series images with identical conditions. 2. Create a histogram for each thresholded image and use total pixel number as the FISH signal volume. Thanks, C Carl A. Boswell, Ph.D. Molecular and Cellular Biology University of Arizona 520-954-7053 FAX 520-621-3709 |
It seems to me that you first have to be sure that each z-slice is independent --that you are not detecting fluorescence from one slice in another.--
Joel On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Carl Boswell <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi all, -- Joel B. Sheffield, Ph.D Department of Biology Temple University Philadelphia, PA 19122 Voice: 215 204 8839 e-mail: [hidden email] URL: http://astro.temple.edu/~jbs |
In reply to this post by Boswell, Carl A - (cboswell)
Sounds reasonable; in effect you are counting how many voxels are
above a particular threshold. Once you have the number of voxels, if you need an actual measurement just multiply by the real-world volume of one voxel. Craig On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Carl Boswell<[hidden email]> wrote: > Hi all, > I have a user who wants to measure the volume, not intensity, of the > FISH-labeled region in a z-series. > > Any issues with the following proposal, besides using a histogram to get > pixel numbers? > > 1. Threshold the FISH signals for control and experimental Z-Series > images with identical conditions. > 2. Create a histogram for each thresholded image and use total pixel number > as > the FISH signal volume. > > Thanks, > C > > Carl A. Boswell, Ph.D. > Molecular and Cellular Biology > University of Arizona > 520-954-7053 > FAX 520-621-3709 > |
In reply to this post by JOEL B. SHEFFIELD
Correct me if I'm wrong, but in order to properly sample the image without aliasing (ie: proper Nyquist sampling), must you not set the lateral pixel and z-step size such that a single diffraction limited spot is sampled 2.3 times in xy and in z as well (bearing in mind that the resolution - counting just the voxels in that case would overestimate the volume, wouldn't it?
If you purposely set the voxel size to by 2 Airy units instead of 1, then you might avoid this problem, but you risk losing spatial resolution and creating aliasing artifacts, right? Perhaps this is okay if you don't care about the loss of spatial resolution? John Oreopoulos On 20-Aug-09, at 3:11 PM, JOEL B. SHEFFIELD wrote: It seems to me that you first have to be sure that each z-slice is independent --that you are not detecting fluorescence from one slice in another.-- |
In reply to this post by Boswell, Carl A - (cboswell)
Carl,
I believe the ImageJ 3D Objects Counter plugin will give the volume of each object after thresholding the image. Dave Dave McDonald Scientific Imaging Lab Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 1100 Fairview Avenue North, DE-512 Seattle, WA 98109 206-667-4205 http://www.fhcrc.org At 11:31 AM 8/20/2009, you wrote: >Hi all, >I have a user who wants to measure the volume, not intensity, of the >FISH-labeled region in a z-series. > >Any issues with the following proposal, besides using a histogram to >get pixel numbers? > >1. Threshold the FISH signals for control and experimental Z-Series >images with identical conditions. >2. Create a histogram for each thresholded image and use total pixel number as >the FISH signal volume. > >Thanks, >C > >Carl A. Boswell, Ph.D. >Molecular and Cellular Biology >University of Arizona >520-954-7053 >FAX 520-621-3709 |
In reply to this post by John Oreopoulos
Sorry, part of my message got cut off there, I was trying to say, ("bearing in mind that the resolution in z will be less than in xy").
John Oreopoulos On 20-Aug-09, at 3:38 PM, John Oreopoulos wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but in order to properly sample the image without aliasing (ie: proper Nyquist sampling), must you not set the lateral pixel and z-step size such that a single diffraction limited spot is sampled 2.3 times in xy and in z as well (bearing in mind that the resolution - counting just the voxels in that case would overestimate the volume, wouldn't it? |
In reply to this post by Boswell, Carl A - (cboswell)
Due to the non symmetrical PSF I don't think this is directly possible.
There is a solution tho' please see: Soeller, C. & Cannell, M.B. (1999) Examination of the transverse tubular system in living cardiac rat myocytes by 2-photon microscopy and digital image-processing techniques. Circ. Res. 84: 266-275 Note that this blurring method does not depend on imaging modality but makes the effective PSF spherical which is what you need. Cheers Mark Carl Boswell wrote: > Hi all, > I have a user who wants to measure the volume, not intensity, of the > FISH-labeled region in a z-series. > > Any issues with the following proposal, besides using a histogram to > get pixel numbers? > > 1. Threshold the FISH signals for control and experimental Z-Series > images with identical conditions. > 2. Create a histogram for each thresholded image and use total pixel > number as > the FISH signal volume. > > Thanks, > C > > Carl A. Boswell, Ph.D. > Molecular and Cellular Biology > University of Arizona > 520-954-7053 > FAX 520-621-3709 |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |