George McNamara |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** Hi Dave, Fixed cells, assuming thin and wanting subcellular details and refractive index 1.515 mounting media (that also suppresses photobleaching), a new plan apo 63x/1.4 NA lens: point scanning confocal microscope with galvo-Z or pizeo-Z drive. Possibly in resonant scanner mode (8000 lines per second, maybe 10 frame averaging per channel). Sequential scanning (one laser per track). Ideally with GaAsP or hybrid detector(s) in photon counting mode. Followed by quantitative deconvolution (hopefully at least Q.D. company has optimized its algorithm for photon counting confocal and/or multiphoton). Live cells - depends on cell type and possibly fluorophore(s). Probably high NA water immersion, glycerol or (if I had one) new silicon oil immersion lens (speaking of which, I still have not seen papers using cell culture media R.I. matched to the immersion medium of glycerol or silicon oil lenses). At one extreme, the following paper gave a clear win to multiphoton imaging: Squirrell JM, Wokosin DL, White JG, Bavister BD. Long-term two-photon fluorescence imaging of mammalian embryos without compromising viability. Nat Biotechnol. 1999 Aug;17(8):763-7. PubMed PMID: 10429240. Having just organized a shared instrumentation grant proposal, if I can change your instrument rules: Applied Precision OMX V4, appropriate lens for fixed or live cells, "fully loaded" (4 lasers, 4 cameras, with TIRF ... the proposal is for 1 camera but with TIRF). If someone would buy my core in Miami a Leica STED SMD (single molecule detection) HyD's instrument (and full set of lenses, and pay for the service contract, please), I'll get you better data than anyone else on the list (except those with an identical instrument) for fixed cells. If the live cells are EGFP-fusion expressing /E coli /cells I'll get you amazing STED images. If you want to image live hamster embryos, STED is not going to be tool to use. Sincerely, George -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Live cell imaging with multiphoton confocal Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:29:03 -0400 From: David Knecht charter <[hidden email]> Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]> To: [hidden email] ***** To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** I have limited experience with multi-photon confocal microscopes. I tried imaging live cells with one a while back and was unimpressed with the results as compared to a standard laser scanning instrument. If you had a new single photon instrument and a new multi-photon instrument sitting side by side in your facility (and I presume some of you do), which would you choose for imaging fixed cells or live cells in culture (not trying to go deep into tissue)? Thanks- Dave Dr. David Knecht Department of Molecular and Cell Biology Co-head Flow Cytometry and Confocal Microscopy Facility U-3125 91 N. Eagleville Rd. University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269 860-486-2200 860-486-4331 (fax) |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |