![]() ![]() |
George McNamara |
![]() |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy ***** GPU-based 3D Deconvolution update: TITAN card enables FLASH4.0 full sensor Z-series Bruce, Butte 2013, Real-time GPU-based 3D Deconvolution, Optics Express: I've had their ImageJ plugin since publication (free to academic users). With my old GPU card (Quadro 2000) I could process a 512x512x32 plane stack with 100 iterations (far nicer than typical default that ends around 30) in ~7 seconds (faster than it takes to type in all the parameters!) but was unable to process Hamamatsu FLASH4.0 sCMOS 2,048x2048 pixel images of any number of planes. We just installed a NVidia (EVGA) GeForce GTX TITAN card (6 gigabytes ram, 2880 processors, faster clock, faster data transfer, list price around $1050, UT MDACC might have paid a bit less than internet list price), now takes 1.6 seconds to do 100 iterations of 512x512x32 plane, and 17 second for 2048x2048x32 planes (single channel ... can also operate with "RGB" 16-bit images). After exchanging emails with Manish Butte I now know to use power of 2 number of Z-planes (and knew to use power of 2 XY pixels). http://www.opticsinfobase.org/oe/fulltext.cfm?uri=oe-21-4-4766 http://tcell.stanford.edu/software.html I am not claiming that B&B GPU deconvolution produces the best possible images - in fact, SVI has sent me very nice results from the "31" dataset (url below) and I have their new Huygens 4.5 on trial this week (thanks Remko and SVI!). I do like the B&B GPU speed. I often acquire with 500 millisecond exposure times (SOLA light engine, Leica 63x/1.4NA objective lens, Leica filter cubes, FLASH4.0, MetaMorph), so 32 planes is 16 seconds, so GPU time is about the same (ignoring typing in parameters). Typical specimens recently have been similar to those posted at http://stellarisfish.smugmug.com/ I have some raw FISH data posted at http://works.bepress.com/gmcnamara/31/ http://works.bepress.com/gmcnamara/32/ (part 1 of 2) http://works.bepress.com/gmcnamara/33/ (part 2 of 2) enjoy, George p.s. Acquisition time I used depends on experiment ... With the same microscope I have acquired mitochondria targeted YFP in live human T-cells with 1 millisecond exposure time per plane (1/10th chip chip ROI or smaller ... by the way, for non-square ROIs on the FLASH, orientation affects speed, fortunately 512x512 pixels is 1/16th area and square), using nearly the entire dynamic range of the FLASH4.0 (16-bit output). Imaging conditions are not perfect because the cells were in aqueous solution, not glued down. Very little photobleaching because we had Marker Gene Tech's Opti-Klear in the media (I haven't tested Evrogen's DMEMgfp and don't know if they work the same way). I don't expect perfection in any deconvolution with spherical cells in aqueous buffer because the cells themselves act as crystal balls, not infinitely thin layer right at the coverglass. -- George McNamara, Ph.D. Single Cells Analyst L.J.N. Cooper Lab University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, TX 77054 Tattletales http://works.bepress.com/gmcnamara/26/ |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |