Benjamin Smith |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. ***** Hey Microscopists, I recently designed and built a launch optic setup to allow for simultaneous two-photon imaging and optogenetic epi-stimulation on a laser scanning microscope. The setup worked perfectly and was easy to align, so I wanted to share it with anyone who may be trying to do something similar. The CAD file can be found here: https://goo.gl/JHhK5h and an image of the setup can be found here: https://goo.gl/7yEkga The CAD file can be opened using FreeCAD: https://www.freecadweb.org/ The goal of the setup was to ensure that all the lasers pointed to exactly the same point in 3D space on the sample plane, and that the two-photon lasers were diffraction limited at the sample plane. Some additional goals were to minimize the number of kinematic parts to reduce thermal drift, make the footprint compact, and to be able to fully fill the back aperture of a 20x/1.0NA objective. In detail, the mode-locked lasers are joined via a polarizing beam splitter and then pass through a 4x beam expander, while the optical lasers are joined via a dichroic mirror and then pass through a 6x beam expander so that all beams are the same diameter going into the microscope. Both expanders were optimized to use the shortest focal length lenses possible without introducing significant aberrations. To ensure the lasers stay laterally aligned in the sample, all four combined beams then pass through a pinhole that is one Airy unit in diameter for the mode-locked lasers. The focus of each optical laser can then be adjusted to bring them into alignment with the mode-locked lasers along the optical axis at the sample plane. In our setup, the mode-locked lasers have a >99% transmission through the pinhole, while the optical lasers have a >80% transmission. One side note, the polarizing beam splitter has a pretty high GVD, but thanks to the narrow bandwidth of the 140 fs lasers in our setup, the cube results in only a 5% broadening of the pulse. However, with a 70 fs laser this will result in a 61% pulse broadening, so using the 5 mm beamsplitter cube and/or a prism compressor may be necessary. All the other optics in the path have a relatively insignificant contribution to GVD compared to the beam splitter cube (other than the objective, of course). Hope this helps, Ben Smith -- Benjamin E. Smith, Ph. D. Imaging Specialist, Vision Science University of California, Berkeley 195 Life Sciences Addition Berkeley, CA 94720-3200 Tel (510) 642-9712 Fax (510) 643-6791 e-mail: [hidden email] http://vision.berkeley.edu/?page_id=5635 <http://vision.berkeley.edu/> |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |