OME Users Meeting-- Paris, June 15/16, 2010 -- Programme Up!!!!

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Jason Swedlow Jason Swedlow
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

OME Users Meeting-- Paris, June 15/16, 2010 -- Programme Up!!!!

Dear All-

The programme is now up for the OME Users Meeting, and it's quite a line-up. The focus will be integration and interoperability (sound familiar?!?!)  and we'll have alot to discuss.

To see the programme, go to:

http://www.openmicroscopy.org/site/events/ome-users-meeting-2010

and follow the links for the Programme.

As in previous years, Spencer Shorte will host the meeting at the Institut Pasteur.  In the past these meetings have been incredibly important for defining the development priorities for the project, and growing the OME Community.

We've had a number of people register from both academia and industry, and we are looking forward to an exciting meeting.

For meeting registration, please contact:

[hidden email]

Please do this as soon as possible to guarantee a place.  We will supply lunch both days.  When you register, we will try to arrange accommodation in one of the surrounding hotels.  Note that we cannot pay for accommodation, and our ability to arrange places may be limited by availability-- register early to ensure a spot!

We look forward to another great meeting-- these meetings have been very exciting for all, and we look forward to another stimulating couple of days in Paris.

As always, thanks for your support.

Cheers,

Jason & Spencer


--
**************************
Wellcome Trust Centre for Gene Regulation & Expression
College of Life Sciences
MSI/WTB/JBC Complex
University of Dundee
Dow Street
Dundee  DD1 5EH
United Kingdom

phone (01382) 385819
Intl phone:  44 1382 385819
FAX   (01382) 388072
email: [hidden email]

Lab Page: http://gre.lifesci.dundee.ac.uk/staff/jason_swedlow.html
Open Microscopy Environment: http://openmicroscopy.org
**************************
Tamara Davey Tamara Davey
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Animal Imaging Instrumentation

Hi all,

We are in the process of setting up the first animal imaging facility in Western Australia and in the process of purchasing an in vivo multispectral imager and an in vivo micro CT system. We will be a running a multi-user facility and therefore need to cater for multiple areas of research which include animal and plant research. We are looking at number of in vivo imaging systems including the CRiMaestro, Calipur IVIS and the Carestream Multispectral systems. However, it is likely that researchers will require both bioluminescence and fluorescence capabilities which limits the Maestro system. Similarly, we are considering a number of in vivo micro CT systems including Skyscan, Siemens and GE-Healthcare. Versatility, reliability, sensitivity and user friendliness are of some of the major areas of importance to us.

If any one could give us some comments, feedback or suggestions on any of this instrumentation it would be appreciated.

Thanks

Tamara

 

Tamara Davey PhD
Research Associate
Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis (CMCA)
The University of Western Australia
Mail Bag 510
35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009
 
Ph: +61 8 9346 4410
Email: [hidden email]
Web: http://www.cmca.uwa.edu.au

George McNamara George McNamara
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Animal Imaging Instrumentation

Hi Tamara,

Read:

Mol Imaging Biol. 2009 Dec 10. [Epub ahead of print]


A Comparison Between Time Domain and Spectral Imaging Systems for Imaging Quantum Dots in Small Living Animals.

de la Zerda A, Bodapati S, Teed R, Schipper ML, Keren S, Smith BR, Ng JS, Gambhir SS.
Department of Radiology, Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), The Bio-X Program, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.


Abstract

PURPOSE: We quantified the performance of time-domain imaging (TDI) and spectral imaging (SI) for fluorescence imaging of quantum dots (QDs) in three distinct imaging instruments: eXplore Optix (TDI, Advanced Research Technologies Inc.), Maestro (SI, CRi Inc.), and IVIS-Spectrum (SI, Caliper Life Sciences Inc.). PROCEDURE: The instruments were compared for their sensitivity in phantoms and living mice, multiplexing capabilities (ability to resolve the signal of one QD type in the presence of another), and the dependence of contrast and spatial resolution as a function of depth. RESULTS: In phantoms, eXplore Optix had an order of magnitude better sensitivity compared to the SI systems, detecting QD concentrations of ~40 pM in vitro. Maestro was the best instrument for multiplexing QDs. Reduction of contrast and resolution as a function of depth was smallest with eXplore Optix for depth of 2-6 mm, while other depths gave comparable results in all systems. Sensitivity experiments in living mice showed that the eXplore Optix and Maestro systems outperformed the IVIS-Spectrum. CONCLUSION: TDI was found to be an order of magnitude more sensitive than SI at the expense of speed and very limited multiplexing capabilities. For deep tissue QD imaging, TDI is most applicable for depths between 2 and 6 mm, as its contrast and resolution degrade the least at these depths.
PMID: 20012220

One problem with the paper is they did not do a fair comparison in terms of exposure duration. One of the ART experiments included a 50 minute exposure, whereas the Maestrao and Xenogen were seconds. They also did not appear to use the spectral unmixing capability of the IVIS Spectrum.

They also failed to discuss that the Xenogen IVIS was initially designed for firefly luciferase imaging - its cryogenic cooled back illuminated CCD camera far outperforms the Carestream and Maestro cameras. That the "Spectrum" features were added is a marketing issue - hopefully your users will saturate the IVIS use in BLI.

With respect to luciferases, Brian Rabinovich has published a firefly luciferase that is far superior to Promega's pGL3 (mainly because of Brian hand optimized the sequence to eliminate splice sites - amino acid coding sequence is the same). He has also made improved Gaussia and Renilla luciferases. The original MTA was tedious but he has now been allowed to simplify it to the end user including Brian as a coauthor on all papers and letting Brian review/comment the manuscript(s) before it goes out.

 
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 23;105(38):14342-6. Epub 2008 Sep 15.


Visualizing fewer than 10 mouse T cells with an enhanced firefly luciferase in immunocompetent mouse models of cancer.

Rabinovich BA, Ye Y, Etto T, Chen JQ, Levitsky HI, Overwijk WW, Cooper LJ, Gelovani J, Hwu P.
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 7455 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77054, USA. [hidden email]


Abstract

Antigen specific T cell migration to sites of infection or cancer is critical for an effective immune response. In mouse models of cancer, the number of lymphocytes reaching the tumor is typically only a few hundred, yet technology capable of imaging these cells using bioluminescence has yet to be achieved. A combination of codon optimization, removal of cryptic splice sites and retroviral modification was used to engineer an enhanced firefly luciferase (ffLuc) vector. Compared with ffLuc, T cells expressing our construct generated >100 times more light, permitting detection of as few as three cells implanted s.c. while maintaining long term coexpression of a reporter gene (Thy1.1). Expression of enhanced ffLuc in mouse T cells permitted the tracking of <3 x 10(4) adoptively transferred T cells infiltrating sites of vaccination and preestablished tumors. Penetration of light through deep tissues, including the liver and spleen, was also observed. Finally, we were able to enumerate infiltrating mouse lymphocytes constituting <0.3% of total tumor cellularity, representing a significant improvement over standard methods of quantitation including flow cytometry.
PMID: 18794521

My friend Mike Rosol runs a small animal imaging core - http://hcc.musc.edu/research/sharedresources/smallanimalimaging.htm has his equipment:

Equipment:

Currently, the HCC Small Animal Imaging Facility has a Caliper Life
Sciences IVIS 200 small animal optical imaging device, a Siemens
Inveon micro-CT/PET, and access to a shared Bruker 7T MRI. The
following are the main instruments housed in the HCC:


• Xenogen/Caliper Life Sciences IVIS 200 Bioluminescent Imaging System

The IVIS 200 is capable of imaging up to 5 animals at a time and is
also capable of providing limited 3-D depth information. The imaging
system consists of an enclosed, heated container containing a
specimen platform for the animals and a cooled, back-thinned CCD
camera to capture both a visible light photograph of the subjects and
the luminescent image. Images can be obtained in less than one
minute and are readily quantifiable.


• Siemens Inveon Micro-CT/PET

This dual-modality system is manufactured by Siemens Medical
Solutions (Knoxville, TN) and contains the latest in software and
hardware. Both micro-CT and micro-PET images can be acquired,
and image data can be co-registered so that the PET image data can
be anatomically localized with the micro-CT imaging data.
The micro-CT unit contains a 30-80 kVp x-ray source. The system
allows for an approximately 9 cm x 6 cm maximum field of view.
Ultra-high resolution images down to 15 µm of ex vivo specimens
can be obtained. Specialized software and phantoms for bone
quantitation are available.
For micro-PET studies we have ready access to 18F-FDG for high
resolution metabolic imaging. The instrument is capable of using CT
or 57Co for attenuation correction. Images of one to several mm in
spatial resolution are achievable.

CT vs X-ray ... do your users always need CT? You might also want to think about a Faxitron, Kubtec or other X-ray machine, or Carestream fluorescence+X-ray or the new Xenogen+X-ray.

Besides price and guesstimate of amount of use, you should also think about service contract prices and what kind of service you are going to afford and realistically get.



best wishes,


George


At 02:54 AM 5/7/2010, you wrote:
Hi all,
We are in the process of setting up the first animal imaging facility in Western Australia and in the process of purchasing an in vivo multispectral imager and an in vivo micro CT system. We will be a running a multi-user facility and therefore need to cater for multiple areas of research which include animal and plant research. We are looking at number of in vivo imaging systems including the CRiMaestro, Calipur IVIS and the Carestream Multispectral systems. However, it is likely that researchers will require both bioluminescence and fluorescence capabilities which limits the Maestro system. Similarly, we are considering a number of in vivo micro CT systems including Skyscan, Siemens and GE-Healthcare. Versatility, reliability, sensitivity and user friendliness are of some of the major areas of importance to us.
If any one could give us some comments, feedback or suggestions on any of this instrumentation it would be appreciated.
Thanks
Tamara
 
Tamara Davey PhD

Research Associate
Centre for Microscopy, Characterisation and Analysis (CMCA)
The University of Western Australia
Mail Bag 510
35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009
 
Ph: +61 8 9346 4410
Email: [hidden email]
Web: http://www.cmca.uwa.edu.au