We need to label a purified protein with a fluorescent dye for use with a 633 laser. The imaging will be dual with either an mCherry or GFP label. I have seen Alexa, Highlight and Dylight labeling kits from various companies. Has anyone had experience that would lead to a recommendation for one dye/kit over another? Thanks- Dave
Dr. David Knecht Department of Molecular and Cell Biology Co-head Flow Cytometry and Confocal Microscopy Facility U-3125 91 N. Eagleville Rd. University of Connecticut Storrs, CT 06269 860-486-2200 860-486-4331 (fax) |
We've always gotten decent labeling with the AF kits. Procedure is
ludicrously simple and fast - you have ready-to-use conjugate in about 2 hrs. The stock dye (TFP ester) seems pretty stable - we've gotten good labeling from a batch over 1 yr old. Our experience is based on reactions with ca 0.5 mg of protein. Have no experience with the other kits. >We need to label a purified protein with a fluorescent dye for use >with a 633 laser. The imaging will be dual with either an mCherry or >GFP label. I have seen Alexa, Highlight and Dylight labeling kits >from various companies. Has anyone had experience that would lead >to a recommendation for one dye/kit over another? Thanks- Dave > >Dr. David Knecht >Department of Molecular and Cell Biology >Co-head Flow Cytometry and Confocal Microscopy Facility >U-3125 >91 N. Eagleville Rd. >University of Connecticut >Storrs, CT 06269 >860-486-2200 >860-486-4331 (fax) -- Robert J. Palmer Jr., Ph.D. Natl Inst Dental Craniofacial Res - Natl Insts Health Oral Infection and Immunity Branch Bldg 30, Room 310 30 Convent Drive Bethesda MD 20892 ph 301-594-0025 fax 301-402-0396 |
In reply to this post by Knecht, David
|
Dear Christian,
As far as I can tell from the extant literature your FV500 should measure roGFP as well as any contemporary confocal. Sequential line scans in a rasterizing detector such as the FluoView alternate on the order of 0.5 millisecond to milliseconds, so structures as large as a mitochondrion won't have time to move. Take a look at Gutscher et al. (J. Biol. Chem. 284:31532), who used a Perkin Elmer spinning disc. I don't think that a spectral detector such as the 510 Meta or the Nikon A1s, which my lab uses, will confer much advantage for this assay. All the best, Tim Timothy Feinstein, PhD Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Pittsburgh On Dec 3, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Christian wrote:
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |