Roy Edward-2 |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. ***** Dear Anastasia, Did you achieve a resolution to this issue? Although I see you are using DRAQ5 (our product) I saw the quick responses from others and thought you¹d received good sensible advice that I couldn¹t add anything to. However, on further reflection it may be that the combination of lipophilic probes/dyes working together will increase the lipophilicity generally and increase non-specificity and crosstalk between the probes/dyes. For example, DRAQ5, though being a DNA specific probe that intercalates into dsDNA, is lipophilic - a necessary property for it to behave as a cell-permeant probe. The postulated increased lipophilicity might then re-balance the preference for the specific target and non-specific target accordingly. As an alternative, I would suggest the related DNA probe DRAQ7 which is identically far-red fluorescing and dsDNA specific but is highly watery (it is designed as a cell-impermeant real-time viability probe) and functions very well as a nuclear counterstain when directly compared to DRAQ5 in fixed samples. DRAQ7 has been cited as a counterstain for fixed cells and tissues. One such example is: Palacios-Reyes, et al. ³Williams' neural stem cells: new model for insight into microRNA dysregulation." Frontiers in Bioscience (Elite edition) 5 (2012): 1057-1073. I hope that might help. Don¹t hesitate to contact me off-list if you have specific questions about this. Kind regards, Roy Roy Edward roy(at)biostatus(dot)com BioStatus Limited 56a Charnwood Road, Shepshed, Leics. LE12 9NP T +44 1509 558 163 www.biostatus.com The Home of DRAQ5 and DRAQ7 This electronic message contains information from BioStatus Limited that may be privileged and confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please notify us by telephone or e-mail immediately. BioStatus Ltd is a limited company registered in England and Wales no.3079239. Registered address: 56 Charnwood Road, Shepshed, LEICS LE12 9NP UK >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:13:31 +0200 >From: Anastasia Timofiiv <[hidden email]> >Subject: Lipid Staining Help > >***** >To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: >http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=3Dconfocalmicroscopy >Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. >***** > >Hello, > > I have encountered an interesting problem and was wondering whether >anyone else has ever seen this before: > > I am using fixed (4% PFA, room temperature fixation for 20min) HeLa and >Huh7 cells that were treated with 500=C2=B5M Oleic Acid (an omega-9 fatty >a= >cid) >and am staining for lipids and cholesterol using the following dyes: > >1. DRAQ5 (nuclear stain) >2. NileRed (targets lipids) >3. BODIPY 493/503 (targets lipids) >4. Filipin III (targets cholesterol) > >and am imaging using fluorescence microscopy. If I fix, stain, and image >on >the same day, everything looks as expected (nuclear dye stains properly, >lipid droplets visible). If I re-image the same slides even 48h later, >then >major changes occur, making the slides incomparable. Firstly, the DRAQ5 no >longer stains the nucleus, but rather becomes co-localized with the lipid >dyes. Secondly, the lipid droplets begin to be less sharp and visible, and >thirdly the signal to noise decreases rapidly. The cholesterol staining >(Filipin III) works fine and is perfectly stable. > >I am using Mowiol as a mounting medium, and as a test during >trouble-shooting I tried mounting using Vectashield and that made it much >worse. The cells immediately looked as if the slide had been sitting for >48h or so. Longer fixation (30min) did not change anything. The PFA is >self-made (not commercial) and kept frozen in aliquots, but using >commercial PFA had no effect. > >I know that PFA fixes proteins and not lipids, but it is assumed that the >lipids become immobilized as well due to being "trapped" by fixed >proteins. >Others have stained for lipids and I have looked for possible explanations >for what I'm seeing, but I can't seem to get anywhere. > >My solution is to simply fix, stain, and image all on the same day in >order >to get meaningful images, but it would be nice to know why this happens >and >whether this is a common problem for lipid staining. > >Thank you! >Anastasia |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |