Review of blocking reagants.

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Kevin Sunley Kevin Sunley
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Review of blocking reagants.

Hello everyone,

While this question is specifically confocal-related, I was wondering if
anyone knew a good, comprehensive, review of different blocking reagents
(commercially available, or homebrew) for immunofluorescence staining.

Aside from just listing the standards; x% BSA or milk powder, different
percents of serum, and the commercially available options (Image IT,
etc.), has anyone ever seen a paper that reviews the effectiveness of
these in relation to each other.

Alternatively, if its not in a paper format, has anyone compared these
themselves and found a favourite?


Thanks in advance,


Kevin Sunley
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Canada
George McNamara George McNamara
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Review of blocking reagents

Hi Kevin,

Check out:


Immunofluorescence imaging of DNA damage response proteins: optimizing protocols for super-resolution microscopy.
Bennett BT, Bewersdorf J, Knight KL.
Methods. 2009 May;48(1):63-71. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
PMID: 19245833

as well as Invitrogen's web site for Image-iT FX.

May all your staining be specific,

George



At 08:25 AM 6/4/2009, you wrote:
Hello everyone,

While this question is specifically confocal-related, I was wondering if anyone knew a good, comprehensive, review of different blocking reagents (commercially available, or homebrew) for immunofluorescence staining.

Aside from just listing the standards; x% BSA or milk powder, different percents of serum, and the commercially available options (Image IT, etc.), has anyone ever seen a paper that reviews the effectiveness of these in relation to each other.

Alternatively, if its not in a paper format, has anyone compared these themselves and found a favourite?


Thanks in advance,


Kevin Sunley
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Canada



Mayandi Sivaguru Mayandi Sivaguru
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Review of blocking reagants.

In reply to this post by Kevin Sunley
Kevin, In my experience for quick preps with goat secondary antibodies the Invitrogen Image IT works great. However, for economical and yet effective, for all other routine preps I recommend Tom's protocol as in this link works great and comes for long time.

http://core.igb.uiuc.edu/Blocking%20Protocol%20LM_EM.pdf
Shiv

At 07:25 AM 6/4/2009, you wrote:
Hello everyone,

While this question is specifically confocal-related, I was wondering if anyone knew a good, comprehensive, review of different blocking reagents (commercially available, or homebrew) for immunofluorescence staining.

Aside from just listing the standards; x% BSA or milk powder, different percents of serum, and the commercially available options (Image IT, etc.), has anyone ever seen a paper that reviews the effectiveness of these in relation to each other.

Alternatively, if its not in a paper format, has anyone compared these themselves and found a favourite?


Thanks in advance,


Kevin Sunley
University of Manitoba
Winnipeg, Canada

Mayandi Sivaguru, PhD, PhD
Microscopy Facility Manager
8, Institute for Genomic Biology
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
1206 West Gregory Dr.
Urbana, IL 61801 USA

Office: 217.333.1214
Fax: 217.244.2496
[hidden email]
http://core.igb.uiuc.edu