Scale for fluorescent ligth using the spectral deconvolution

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Pascal Weber Pascal Weber
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Scale for fluorescent ligth using the spectral deconvolution

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Hi everyone,

I make  GFP staining on bacteria in lice. I use it for the deconvolution spectral to
discriminate autofluorescence in fluorescence. Now I would like to quantify the
signal ! Does anyone have any idea how to achieve a standard reference and
keep it over time ?

For now I use the best signal that I could find to create this reference but is valid
spectral deconvolution?

Regards Pascal
Chris Tully Chris Tully
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Scale for fluorescent ligth using the spectral deconvolution

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Pascal,

I would suggest checking with Molecular Probes on the stability of
their of their various beads. They do make on series of beads that
come in a range of intensities that I have seen used as an intensity
standard. You build a curve characterizing your instrument using all
if the beads then spike your sample with one intensity of bead. This
then allows you to find the beads based on shape.

Chris Tully, M.S., Image Analysis Expert
t 240.475.9753 f 419.831.0527 | [hidden email]

Sent from my iPhone please excuse typos.

On Jun 25, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Pascal Weber <[hidden email]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I make  GFP staining on bacteria in lice. I use it for the deconvolution spectral to
> discriminate autofluorescence in fluorescence. Now I would like to quantify the
> signal ! Does anyone have any idea how to achieve a standard reference and
> keep it over time ?
>
> For now I use the best signal that I could find to create this reference but is valid
> spectral deconvolution?
>
> Regards Pascal