Spectral detector

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Maclyn McCarty Maclyn McCarty
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Spectral detector

Dear list members,

I have couple of questions.

Which spectral detector is highly efficient?
Which detector should be suitable for long time live cell imaging?
What is the advantage of 34-Channel QUASAR over 32-Channel?
Which detector can yield higher QE?
Is there any method to check the QE yield?

Maclyn McCarty.
Craig Brideau Craig Brideau
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Spectral detector

The multi-anode PMT-based systems are more efficient than the
slit-scan single PMT systems in that the slit-scan systems throw away
any light that doesn't make it through the slit.  The multi-anode PMT
systems send all the light to different PMT 'bins' so it is all
collected.
For testing quantum yield you need to test the detector relative to
other detectors with a known amount of light.  Basically input a 'test
signal' which is very consistent and see how different detectors deal
with it.

Craig


On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Maclyn McCarty
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> Dear list members,
>
> I have couple of questions.
>
> Which spectral detector is highly efficient?
> Which detector should be suitable for long time live cell imaging?
> What is the advantage of 34-Channel QUASAR over 32-Channel?
> Which detector can yield higher QE?
> Is there any method to check the QE yield?
>
> Maclyn McCarty.
>