What's the latest on in vivo fluorescent proteins

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Caroline Bass Caroline Bass
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

What's the latest on in vivo fluorescent proteins

What's the latest on in vivo fluorescent proteins Hello Everyone,

I’m at the starting point for a new transgenic approach (viral vector mediated) and so it’s a good point to rethink the standard EGFP marker gene that I use. I know there are humanized GFP variants, mCherry, etc. Can anyone suggest a good marker for in vivo work? I will mostly use these vectors in the brain, and the FP will be used to image the spread of the virus. I want something bright, NON-toxic, and easy to work with. I can easily view red and green fluorescence, so something in these ranges are nice.

Thanks,

Caroline
Ian Dobbie Ian Dobbie
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: What's the latest on in vivo fluorescent proteins

Caroline Bass <[hidden email]> writes:

> Hello Everyone,
>
> I’m at the starting point for a new transgenic approach (viral vector
> mediated) and so it’s a good point to rethink the standard EGFP marker
> gene that I use. I know there are humanized GFP variants, mCherry,
> etc. Can anyone suggest a good marker for in vivo work? I will mostly
> use these vectors in the brain, and the FP will be used to image the
> spread of the virus. I want something bright, NON-toxic, and easy to
> work with. I can easily view red and green fluorescence, so something
> in these ranges are nice.

Well EGFP is already recodoned for mammalian expression systems. In
general red stuff is better in terms of less auto-fluorescent
background, while green/yellow is brighter and cameras are more
sensitive.

In my experience mCherry is the best red FP I have used, although someone
mentioned TagRFP to me a few days ago. I haven't yet had time to go
check the literature, or try it out. Anyone else have any experience with
TagRFP?

Ian