George McNamara |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. ***** Dear Confocal listserv, Several percent of NIH's SIG (S10) program has been awarded every year for new light microscopes - confocal, multiphoton, deconvolution, high content screening, etc. The SIG has issues an RFI for comments. In my message to the SIG program I will recommend increasing the annual budget (it's been flat for a long time, except for ARRA bump) to $1B per year, plus annual inflation adjustments (increases), to get a lot more new instruments into the reach of NIH researchers (all instruments, current mix is pretty good). This will also provide an economic stimulus, enabling vendors to increase R&D to produce even better instruments. You can check on recent S10 funded projects at http://projectreporter.nih.gov/reporter.cfm Project number field: 1s10 Note: default search period is current fiscal year (top right corner). In the result table, columns are sortable. By my count there are 99 awards listed 2014 (the default search found 151). The RePORTer database now also shows performance of older grants by amount of publication. The data also includes the amount of money funded - often the price of the instrument (sometimes the institution kicks in some money if over a limit). A couple of current examples: $599K CV7000 $399K Imaging flow cytometer ImageStreamX-markII $395K TIRF microscope $600K CyTOF mass cytometer $600K CyTOF mass cytometer (nice to see consistent funding) $456K Leica SP8 AOBS UV $558K LEICA SP8 WWL CONFOCAL MICROSCOPE $453K TMA Grandmaster-Panoramic 250 system $494K INTEGRATED PHOTOACOUSTIC AND ULTRASOUND IMAGING WITH THE VEVO LAZR $267K FLIM upgrade for Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope $834K BROAD WAVELENGTH RANGE ZEISS 780 NLO/CONFOCAL SYSTEM FOR THE CORNELL IMAGING CORE the 2014 awards summed to $52,546,574 ... I note that the US government fiscal year starts in October, so some of the "2013" entries belong with "2014" (but not all of them!). For the past decade plus, S10 has been funded about $66M per year. This is what I will write in should be at $1B per year. Sincerely, George p.s. for those of you in countries not eligible for S10 awards, I encourage you to contact your funding agencies to publish online research instrument awards, funding requests, and a way to encourage increasing the budget for shared instruments. *From:* Shared Instrumentation *Date:* July 22, 2014 at 4:35:23 AM PDT ***Subject:* *Message from Shared Instrumentation Grant (S10) Program* Dear: This is to let you know that the NIH's Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (ORIP) has issued a Request for Information (RFI) to solicit comments from the community on the Shared Instrumentation Grant (SIG) Program (S10). This RFI is available at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-14-104.html. It gives an opportunity to S10 applicants, users of awarded shared instruments, and others who have interest in the Program to comment on the Program requirements and suggest modifications to improve the Program effectiveness and enhance its impact on the NIH research community. Respectfully yours, SIG Program Office of Research Infrastructure Programs NIH/OD/DPCPSI 6701 Democracy Boulevard Bethesda, MD 20892-4874 301-435-0772 (V) *** https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-14-104.html Response to this RFI is voluntary. All interested parties are invited to respond. The responder should identify themselves in the following categories (the responder can choose more than one category): a. an S10 awardee; b. a user of an S10 awarded instrument; c. an S10 applicant but not an S10 awardee; d. an S10 reviewer; e. a manager of Core facility; g. an NIH-funded investigator; h. an employee of an instrumentation company; f. none of the above, a member of a wider research community. |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |