*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. ***** Dear Microscopists We had TIRF installed on an Olympus IX81, and the side effect of this was a greatly reduced size of illuminated field under normal epifluorescence (TIRF also illuminates only a small portion of the field). Is this how it is supposed to be? Is there a way to get around this limitation? Thank you Mike Model |
John Oreopoulos |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. ***** Hi Mike, What camera are you using - sCMOS, EMCCD, CCD? I haven't used the latest generation Olympus TIRF modules, but my recollection of the older version of the same instrument is that there was a field diaphragm which could be removed and allowed the entire eyepiece field of view to be seen. I was never quite sure why the field diaphragm existed other than perhaps for spot photobleaching purposes. Back then I was using a CCD camera and my whole camera was illuminated, albeit with a Gaussian laser beam profile that rolled-off to the edges of the camera. You could still collect useful data in this manner, however. If you're using an sCMOS camera which has a much larger field of view, perhaps the Gaussian nature of TIRF illumination beam is playing a role here. Again, I have no experience with the current module, but that's one way I could imagine the problem you describe occurring. Cheers, John Oreopoulos On 2015-01-28, at 8:57 AM, MODEL, MICHAEL wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. > ***** > > Dear Microscopists > > We had TIRF installed on an Olympus IX81, and the side effect of this was a greatly reduced size of illuminated field under normal epifluorescence (TIRF also illuminates only a small portion of the field). Is this how it is supposed to be? Is there a way to get around this limitation? Thank you > > Mike Model |
Michael Model |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. ***** Hi John, Thanks for the response. I am talking about direct viewing through eyepieces On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:31 AM, John Oreopoulos < [hidden email]> wrote: > ***** > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. > ***** > > Hi Mike, > > What camera are you using - sCMOS, EMCCD, CCD? I haven't used the latest > generation Olympus TIRF modules, but my recollection of the older version > of the same instrument is that there was a field diaphragm which could be > removed and allowed the entire eyepiece field of view to be seen. I was > never quite sure why the field diaphragm existed other than perhaps for > spot photobleaching purposes. Back then I was using a CCD camera and my > whole camera was illuminated, albeit with a Gaussian laser beam profile > that rolled-off to the edges of the camera. You could still collect useful > data in this manner, however. > > If you're using an sCMOS camera which has a much larger field of view, > perhaps the Gaussian nature of TIRF illumination beam is playing a role > here. Again, I have no experience with the current module, but that's one > way I could imagine the problem you describe occurring. > > Cheers, > > John Oreopoulos > > > On 2015-01-28, at 8:57 AM, MODEL, MICHAEL wrote: > > > ***** > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy > > Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your > posting. > > ***** > > > > Dear Microscopists > > > > We had TIRF installed on an Olympus IX81, and the side effect of this > was a greatly reduced size of illuminated field under normal > epifluorescence (TIRF also illuminates only a small portion of the field). > Is this how it is supposed to be? Is there a way to get around this > limitation? Thank you > > > > Mike Model > |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |