macro for determining signal efficiency two photon

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
Valerie Lawrence Valerie Lawrence
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

macro for determining signal efficiency two photon

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Hi there,

We have a tunable (705nm-980nm) coherent chameleon multiphoton laser.  
We are looking for a macro used to determine efficiency of signal generation
using the two-photon laser at various laser lines.

Does anyone know where we might find such macro to download?

Many thanks.

Valerie Lawrence
Sylvie Le Guyader-2 Sylvie Le Guyader-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: macro for determining signal efficiency two photon

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Hi Valerie

I think that Coherent has one. At least one of the engineers here in Sweden told me recently that he uses such a software.

Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
 
Sylvie
 
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Sylvie Le Guyader
Live Cell Imaging Unit
Dept of Biosciences and Nutrition
Karolinska Institutet
Novum
14183 Huddinge
Sweden
office: +46 (0) 8 5248 1107
LCI room: +46 (0) 8 5248 1172
mobile: +46 (0) 73 733 5008


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List
> [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Valerie
> Lawrence
> Sent: 19 October 2011 23:23
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: macro for determining signal efficiency two photon
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> Hi there,
>
> We have a tunable (705nm-980nm) coherent chameleon multiphoton laser.
> We are looking for a macro used to determine efficiency of signal generation
> using the two-photon laser at various laser lines.
>
> Does anyone know where we might find such macro to download?
>
> Many thanks.
>
> Valerie Lawrence