*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. ***** If anyone is familiar with SERS, could you share which groups doing great SERS research these days ? for bioanalytical applications. Thank you in advance. Alex |
Barbara Foster |
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. ***** Interestingly, Alex, there is a lot of work going on right now on the microscopy version of SERS called TERS (tip enhanced Raman Spectroscopy). Combining SERS on the tip of an AFM probe with the ability to simultaneously image is really powerful. I wrote an article last year for American Lab on a hybrid instrument developed jointly by Horiba (leader in Raman) and AIST-NT (an industry leader in AFM. There's a PDF in our library at MicroscopyEducation.com: http://microscopyeducation.com/the-library/ There is also a lot of interest in SERS slides themselves. Substrates are becoming more regular, longer lived, and more dependendable. i recommend just Googliing them. While it didn't come up on my Google, search, I saw Biotool's RIM slides several weeks ago at PITTCON. BioTools has extensive experience specifically in biologics and related bioanalytical area to which you alluded in your question. Here's the URL for the RIM slides: http://www.btools.com/u-rim.html This concept is an interesting one. No matter whether TERS or SERS, it involves a surface onto which are deposited nano particles (typically gold, but it can be silver, copper, etc) which can, within a few 10s of nanometers from the surface, act like antennae to boost the Raman signal coming from that surface. Under the right conditions (and that's the hard part!), it can result in signals that are amplified a million fold. This amplification is important either because the Raman signal itself is weak and/or because of competition from fluorescence. There are strong parallels between the Raman/fluorescence competition and the fluorescence/reflected light competition, which confocal microscopists understand all too well. For example, the grass and leaves are always fluorescing red (from the chlorophyll), but we never see that because of the competition with reflected green light. (For those of you who haven't tried this experiment, go find a leaf and put it under your microscope using excitation somewhere in the green). Reflected light is often 1000-10,000x brighter than the related fluorescence. Similarly, fluorescence is about 10,000x brighter than the Raman signal from the similar material. Caveat: No commercial interest in any of the products mentioned here. Good Hunting! Barbara Foster, President & Chief Consultant Microscopy/Microscopy Education ... "Education, not JustTraining" 7101 Royal Glen Trail, Suite A - McKinney, TX 75070 P: 972-924-5310 W: www.MicroscopyEducation.com Microscopy/Microscopy Education is a division of The Microscopy & Imaging Place, Inc. NEW! Getting involved in Raman or FTIR? MME is now offering courses in these areas specifically for microscopists! Now scheduling courses through the 2017. We can customize a course on nearly any topic, from fluorescence to confocal to image analysis to SEM/TEM. Call for details At 11:19 AM 3/26/2017, you wrote: >***** >To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: >http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy >Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. >***** > >If anyone is familiar with SERS, could you share which groups doing >great SERS research these days ? for bioanalytical applications. >Thank you in advance. > >Alex |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |