http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/question-about-laser-tp2424346p2433931.html
Please, feel free to tell us a little bit more details than you currently are providing. There is a wealth of information on this list, and with more information from you comes more knowledge from the group. What is your application? It is potentially a cheaper and more practical solution to buy the best laser you can afford that fits the needs of your fluorophore, and then purchase custom dichroic mirrors and bandpass filters if necessary. These can be more affordable to buy than new lasers, and can be custom manufactured to meet your experimental needs from a few companies. Chroma provides this service in a timely fashion. (no commercial interest)
Samuel A. Connell
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
I just want one fixed wavelength within that range eventually. The
sample. I only know it should lay between 380 and 400nm from my other
experiments. And I'm hoping to find an inexpensive way to find out.
> Yes, he was referring to a doubler. The problem is people are
> still not clear whether you want to tune the wavelength between
> 380 and 400 nm (in which case Sergey's suggestion is the most
> practical way to go, but is very expensive) or whether you just
> want one fixed wavelength within that range, which is easy and
> cheap to get with a diode.
>
> Guy
>
>
>
> Optical Imaging Techniques in Cell Biology
> by Guy Cox CRC Press / Taylor & Francis
>
http://www.guycox.com/optical.htm> ______________________________________________
> Associate Professor Guy Cox, MA, DPhil(Oxon)
> Electron Microscope Unit, Madsen Building F09,
> University of Sydney, NSW 2006
> ______________________________________________
> Phone +61 2 9351 3176 Fax +61 2 9351 7682
> Mobile 0413 281 861
> ______________________________________________
>
http://www.guycox.net> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List
> [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of
>
[hidden email]
> Sent: Friday, 6 March 2009 4:18 AM
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: Re: question about laser
>
> I don't quite understand. The laser beam we are looking for is
> between 380 and 400nm. Are you thinking of the doubler? Could you
> please give more detail? Thanks a lot.
>
> Yue
>
>
> Quoting "Femto @Sciner" <
[hidden email]>:
>
>> Second Harmonic of CW Ti:Sapphire tunable between 760 and 800 nm.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Sergey Egorov
>> Del Mar Photonics
>> 4119 Twilight Ridge
>> San Diego, CA 92130
>> tel (858) 876-3133
>> fax (858) 630-2376
>>
http://www.dmphotonics.com/>>
>>
>>
[hidden email] wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> We are looking for a coherent (or continuous wave) laser ranging
>>> from 380nm to 400nm. So far we haven't found anything impressive.
>>> Does anyone know any laser between that range? Thanks a lot!
>>>
>>> Yue
>>>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.7/1983 - Release Date:
> 4/03/2009 7:41 AM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.7/1983 - Release Date:
> 4/03/2009 7:41 AM
>
>