Re: TIRF and p- s-polarized incident linght

Posted by Shigeo Watanabe on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/paper-help-tp4115966p4136539.html


John,

Thank you so much for explaining in a way for me to understand.
Now I am getting to understand better. I just could not believe the cartwheeling polarized light still, though.

Sincerely,

Shigeo Watanabe





John Oreopoulos <[hidden email]>
送信者: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]>

2009/12/09 02:46

Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]> へ
返信してください

宛先
[hidden email]
cc
件名
Re: TIRF and p- s-polarized incident linght





I just remembered another physical analogy that can help explain the reasons why certain polarizations of light reflect or transmit through a refractive index interface. Imagine the polarization of light is represented by a long wooden stick. Now imagine throwing this stick into a large pool of water at an oblique angle such that its long axis is oriented  paralell to the surface of the water. The stick will enter the water easily in this case. Now imagine throwing the stick towards the water at an oblique angle with the long axis perpendicular to the water surface. I think you can imagine in your mind that as the lower part of the stick strikes the surface first and begins to move slower in the water, the top part of the stick still outside the water will begin to rotate and "cartwheel" towards the surface because of its momentum. It's a very crude mechanical analogy and there are several things wrong with it, but I think you get the general similarity with the situation encountered with light waves. Perhaps someone else out there knows of a better analogy. I think I remember reading a version of this story with bouncing sticks on an interface in Richard Feynman's books or in Eugene Hecht's textbook on optics.

John Oreopoulos


On 2009-12-07, at 11:07 PM, John Oreopoulos <
john.oreopoulos@...> wrote:

Shigeo,

Since the core of my PhD project involves exploiting the polarization of light in the TIRF mode of illumination, I guess I can try to explain this. As you know, light can normally be linearly polarized in any direction that is transverse (perpendicular) to the direction of travel of the light beam using polarization optics. Polarization here refers to the direction of oscillation associated with the electric field vector of the light beam. In the epi-illumination mode for microscopy, the beam of light is directed straight through the sample along the optic axis of the microscope objective - call this direction the z-direction. In this case, this means that the light can be polarized along any direction in the xy plane (the sample/image plane) - the plane that gets projected onto your CCD detector. Now consider what happens when you adjust the beam for TIRF illumination - you set up the beam to impinge on the substrate surface at an oblique angle instead of going straight through. From Snell's law of refraction at an interface, you know that the critical angle for a glass/water interface  is ~60 degrees. If you set the beam to impinge the surface at at the critical angle, the refracted beam that emerges from the interface travels horizontally (x-direction) along the surface. You can see this with a bright laser on a TIRF microscope setup and solution of fluorscent dye. Since the laser beam travels along the x-direction in this situation, the same polarization rule applies - now the beam can be polarized in the yz plane depending on the input polarization of the beam before it emerged from the interface. Here is the tricky part: if you increase the angle of incidence beyond the critical angle of the interface, total internal reflection occurs and an evanescent wave/field is created in the lower index medium (water). As a consequence of Maxwell's electromagnetic field equations solved at an interface, the polarization characteristics of the evanescent wave are a bit unusual. These equations have certain boundry conditions that demand that the transition of light (more specifically the light oscillation wavefronts) from one medium to another be continuous for all angles of incidence, and as a consequence, the elecric field vector of the evanescent wave in both mediums (glass and water) must adjust to satisfy this condition. This is a general property that is observed in many physics situations - this idea of continuaty at an interface is the reason that quantum electron tunneling occurs as well. In fact, the evanescent wave is the photon analog of electron tunneling. I would suggest reading Griffeth's textbook Indroductory Electrodynamics for the full details of this dervation about light interactions at an interface. Anyways, it turns out that past the critical angle, light that was originally polarized along the y-axis remains the same ("s-polarization", the s stands for the first letter of the German word for perpendicular to the plane of incidence) but light polarized along the z-direction ("p-polarization, the p stands for the "paralell" to the plane of incidence) for critical angle illumination becomes split into a linear combination of light polarized along z and the x-direction (which is the direction of travel of the evanescent surface wave!). The relative amount of z and x polarization will depend in the refractive indcies and the angle of incidence. This is one of the few examples in nature where light can be setup to partially oscilate along its direction of travel (a longitudinal wave) and this is why the website you mentioned said that the "p-polarized" evenescent electric field vector "cartwheels" along the direction of travel.

After reading what I just wrote I see that it still might be unclear. Working with polarization can be tricky because it is the feature of light we as humans are most unfamiliar with since our eyes cannot sense/detect polarization. It's hard to visualize in your mind imaginary field vectors oscillating and traveling in space. If it's still unclear, try reading Dan Axelrod's review papers on TIRF microscopy where he discusses the applications of polarized TIRF illumination. I think there is even a useful Java applet on the Molecular Expressions website that does a bettter job of depecting this. Polarized illumination (epifluorescence or TIRF mode) can be useful for studying the orientations of fluorescent molecules embedded in a sample (linear dichroism, fluorescence anisotropy, etc.)

John Oreopoulos


On 2009-12-07, at 5:44 PM, Shigeo Watanabe <
[hidden email][hidden email]> wrote:


Dear all,


I have questions about TIRF and polarized light.

Incident light can be devided into p- and s- polarized light.

Then what happen to these two light when evanescent light is induced by these light.


Olympus webpage explains these, but I could not understand these phrase.

"A non-zero longitudinal component and phase lag manifests the p-polarized incident light, which has an evanescent electric field vector direction that remains in the plane of incidence. The longitudinal component induces the p-polarized light electric field vector to "cartwheel" along the interface and produce elliptical polarization of the evanescent field in the plane of propagation."




Olympus web page is here.

http://www.olympusmicro.com/primer/java/tirf/evaintensity/index.html

 
I appreciate if there are somebody who can explain these to me.



Sincerely


Shigeo Watanabe

Hamamatsu Photonics KK.