http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Scattered-light-from-AOTF-tp5352866p5352982.html
of each laser? Some matte black painted metal will do the job. It
manually but it would be cheap and get the job done. This assumes you
> Hi All,
> I have what seems like a trivial question, but I cannot seem to sort it out,
> and wondered if others have experience/solutions to offer. I have two
> excitation lasers combined (i.e. overlapped) via a dichroic mirror and
> directed into an AA AOTF (opto.braggcell.com). The AOTF is used to shutter
> the beams and control their intensities. Overall, the system works well.
> Back reflections from the front face of the AOTF are very nearly colinear
> with the incoming beams (purposely slightly mis-aligned to prevent
> back-reflection into the lasers), as are first-order diffracted beams. The
> zero-order beams are reflected by a pick-off mirror into a light trap.
> Following the AOTF, the first-order beams are expanded by a 10X beam
> expander (i.e. telescope), after which they enter our microscope. The faces
> of the crytsal in the AOTF and dichroic mirror are free of dust,
> fingerprints, etc. The input beam diameter is approximately 1-2 mm, and
> strikes the AOTF input aperture very nearly at the center.
>
> The problem is, even when all laser lines are off (or when the AOTF itself
> is powered-down), there is minimal, but noticable scattered light exiting
> the AOTF. Some of this light is collected by the beam expander and enters
> the microscope (this is what I want to eliminate). I've more or less
> ruled-out that the scattering occurs after the AOTF, and believe it may be
> due to reflections at the front surface (entrance) of the AOTF or within it.
> Since it occurs even when the AOTF is off, it does not seem to be an
> acousto-optic effect. My current thought is to move the AOTF farther from
> the telescope, and to use a smaller aperture lens at the telescope input,
> but what I'd really like to do is eliminate the scattered light. I've also
> thought of using a pinhole as a spatial filter at the telescope focus, but
> since the scattered light is focused at more or less the same spot, the hole
> would have to be fairly small, and I'd like to avoid adding another element
> to the system that is time-consuming to align.
>
> Any advice or ideas would be much appreciated!
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Matt
>
>
> --
> Matthew Nicholas
> Medical Scientist Training Program Student
> Laboratory of Arne Gennerich
> Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology
> Albert Einstein College of Medicine
> Forchheimer Building, Room 628
> 1300 Morris Park Avenue
> Bronx, New York 10461
> 718.430.3446
>
[hidden email]