Re: Pixel size

Posted by G. Esteban Fernandez on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Acceptor-Photobleaching-vs-Sensitized-Emission-FRET-results-tp4828946p5632667.html

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

If there is no standard of known size available an alternative could
be to acquire images of any specimen before and after moving the stage
a known distance, if equipped with that capability.

-Esteban


On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Cameron Nowell
<[hidden email]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> Ok take two. First reply didn't go to the whole list.
>
> For those that don't have access to a stage micrometer you can use a haemocytometer instead. The boxes on it ate 250, 200 and 50um.
>
> Cheers
>
> Cam
>
>
> This communication is intended only for the named recipient and may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or subject to copyright; the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd does not waive any rights if you have received this communication in error.
> The views expressed in this communication are those of the sender and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research Ltd.
>