Re: Estimating field of view in an LSM

Posted by Craig Brideau on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Estimating-field-of-view-in-an-LSM-tp590288p590291.html

Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Also a very good point.  Transferring from the image plane is
straightforward.  Again, I'll try a couple methods and compare them to
known situations.

Craig


On 9/22/07, Guy Cox <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> I'm not sure I see the problem.  Surely
> you can find or borrow one lens at least -
> the rest is just scaling.  Rather than buy
> an expensive test sample I'd suggest
> bleaching an area on a disposable sample
> and measuring the bleached area.  Or for
> a low-power objective mark some lines with
> a fine black pen on one of the Chroma
> fluorescent plastic slides.
>
> If you really want to do it by ray-tracing
> I suggest not doing it through the objective
> (since, as you say, it's not quite clear where
> the bfp of the objective is) but transferring
> your angles to displacements at the primary image
> plane - you can rely on the objective to do a
> faithful demagnification of the image plane to
> the sample - of course this does asssume you are
> forming your image at the correct plane.
>
>                                    Guy
>
>
>
> Optical Imaging Techniques in Cell Biology
> by Guy Cox    CRC Press / Taylor & Francis
>     http://www.guycox.com/optical.htm
> ______________________________________________
> Associate Professor Guy Cox, MA, DPhil(Oxon)
> Electron Microscope Unit, Madsen Building F09,
> University of Sydney, NSW 2006
> ______________________________________________
> Phone +61 2 9351 3176     Fax +61 2 9351 7682
> Mobile 0413 281 861
> ______________________________________________
>      http://www.guycox.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Craig Brideau
> Sent: Saturday, 22 September 2007 6:30 AM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Re: Estimating field of view in an LSM
>
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Yeah, I want to be able to predict the field ahead of time BEFORE I buy an objective.  I'll have to keep looking in to the theory.  If it was a simple lens I could just use some ray trace equations, but microscope objectives are very much 'black box' devices due to their complexity, and proprietary design.  Still, good advice for characterizing my existing lenses.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Craig
>
> On 9/21/07, Steffen Dietzel <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> > http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
> >
> > Craig,
> >
> > for the theory I don't know, but to actually meassure the field of
> > view (or the size of your pixels) you can use a 1951 USAF Resolution
> > Test Chart. See e.g.
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1951_USAF_Resolution_Test_Chart
> >
> > There are several suppliers you can google for. I got mine from Edmund
> > Optics. It has a mirror coating on the top surface so that it can be
> > used in reflection mode.
> >
> > Steffen
> >
> >
> >
> > At 22:16 20.09.2007, you wrote:
> > >Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> > >http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
> > >
> > >Just to clarify, I am doing multiphoton with a single PMT, so I'm
> > >trying to measure the field that the laser is focused over at the
> > >focal plane of the objective for a given input beam deflection.
> > >
> > >Craig
> > >
> > >On 9/20/07, Craig Brideau <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > > I was wondering how I estimate the field of view for a given lens
> > > > in a laser scanning microscope?  I know it will depend on the
> > > > entrance angle of the beam into the back aperture of the lens, but
> > > > I don't know how to translate this into lateral focal point
> > > > displacement for a given working distance/NA/magnification of
> > > > lens.  Can anyone point me towards some good references?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Craig
> > > >
> >
>
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.19/1008 - Release Date: 14/09/2007 8:59 AM
>
>
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.487 / Virus Database: 269.13.19/1008 - Release Date: 14/09/2007 8:59 AM
>
>