http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/FW-Deconvolve-1-42-Components-Setup-now-OK-tp590745p590771.html
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal>
> Hi Glen,
>
> We have replaced the arc-lamps on 2 of our facilities Zeiss confocals
> now 6 month ago by the CoolLED Ltd solution. We use 400nm, 465nm,
> and
> 525nm, and it works well (no complaints from users so far). We
> modified
> the filtercubes to have max ex efficiency. I understood CoolLEDs are
> also sold with Olympus adapters.
>
> cheers, jens
>
> ---
> Dr. Jens Rietdorf
> Head Microscopy
> Novartis Research Foundation
> Friedrich-Miescher-Institute, wro1066.2.32
> Maulbeerstr.66, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland
> phone +41(61)69-75172 mobil +41 798284737
> Email:rietdorf(at)fmi.ch
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List
> [mailto:
[hidden email]] On
> Behalf Of Glen MacDonald
> Sent: Montag, 5. November 2007 20:02
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: Non-arc source for IX-81
>
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal>
> Has anyone replaced the mercury illuminator on an Olympus IX-81 with a
> non-arc source such as metal-halogen or LED? I'm looking for
> experiences regarding reliability, operational cost and performance
> on a
> laser scanning confocal installation.
>
> Off-line commercial responses are welcome.
> Thanks,
> Glen
>
>
>
> Glen MacDonald
> Core for Communication Research
> Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center Box 357923 University
> of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-7923 USA
> (206) 616-4156
>
[hidden email]
>
> **********************************************************************
> **
> ******
> The box said "Requires WindowsXP or better", so I bought a Macintosh.
> **********************************************************************
> **
> ******