Re: Non-arc source for IX-81

Posted by John Oreopoulos on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/FW-Deconvolve-1-42-Components-Setup-now-OK-tp590745p590777.html

Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi Glen,

My thesis project involves modification of a fluorescence microscope  
for a specialized type of measurement, and as such I'm usually  
ordering optical prototyping equipment from Thorlabs. I noticed  
recently they've introduced full LED microscope illumination  
attachments  which can fit to the back epi-illumination port of  
microscopes made by all of the major microscope manufacturers. I've  
never had the chance to try them, so I can't comment on how well they  
light up a sample. They might be worth checking out though.

Here's the link:

http://www.thorlabs.com/NewGroupPage9.cfm?
ObjectGroup_ID=2615&visNavID=223

John Oreopoulos, BSc,
PhD Candidate
University of Toronto
Institute For Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering
Centre For Studies in Molecular Imaging

Tel: W:416-946-5022



On 5-Nov-07, at 2:02 PM, Glen MacDonald wrote:

> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Has anyone replaced the mercury illuminator on an Olympus IX-81  
> with a non-arc source such as metal-halogen or LED?  I'm looking  
> for experiences regarding reliability, operational cost and  
> performance on a laser scanning confocal installation.
>
> Off-line commercial responses are welcome.
> Thanks,
> Glen
>
>
>
> Glen MacDonald
> Core for Communication Research
> Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center
> Box 357923
> University of Washington
> Seattle, WA 98195-7923  USA
> (206) 616-4156
> [hidden email]
>
> **********************************************************************
> ********
> The box said "Requires WindowsXP or better", so I bought a Macintosh.
> **********************************************************************
> ********