Re: Non-arc source for IX-81

Posted by Craig Brideau on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/FW-Deconvolve-1-42-Components-Setup-now-OK-tp590745p590780.html

Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

We looked somewhat into using LEDs as general purpose fluorescence and
illumination lamps a while back.  It basically boils down to the
wavelengths you need to access with your lamp.  A white LED will get
much of the visible spectrum, for instance, but if you are imaging
something with a UV-responsive dye you will need a different LED.

Craig


On 11/5/07, Glen MacDonald <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Has anyone replaced the mercury illuminator on an Olympus IX-81 with
> a non-arc source such as metal-halogen or LED?  I'm looking for
> experiences regarding reliability, operational cost and performance
> on a laser scanning confocal installation.
>
> Off-line commercial responses are welcome.
> Thanks,
> Glen
>
>
>
> Glen MacDonald
> Core for Communication Research
> Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center
> Box 357923
> University of Washington
> Seattle, WA 98195-7923  USA
> (206) 616-4156
> [hidden email]
>
> ************************************************************************
> ******
> The box said "Requires WindowsXP or better", so I bought a Macintosh.
> ************************************************************************
> ******
>