Dear Urs,
With the technique you describe, using the transmitted light detector (TLD) on a point scanning confocal and collecting (non-confocal) brightfield (BF) images, without any DIC or phase elements, you can get variable results.
If the cells are quite thick or rounded up and especially if grown on plastic the results can be quite pleasing. Unfortunately if the cells are flat, grown on a coverslip and you are using a water immersion lens (ie ideal conditions for confocal microscopy) the BF images can be very disappointing. The cell can be all but invisible. Hence contrast enhancing techniques such as phase, DIC, and QPm come into their own.
The opposite applies too. If the specimen is quite thick like a 6 day old zebrafish embryo, parts of the specimen may have too much contrast rendering parts of the BF image black and hence obscuring details. Using the software QPm you can overcome these limitations. You can even separate absorption signals such as that cause by minerals or melanin, from the phase signals. I have used this technique to image zebrafish embryos with melanin pigment, and removed the absorption contribution of the image so that all is left is the pure DIC or Phase image. This is not possible with pure optical methods where the absorption component of the image normally makes up about 30% of a DIC signal.
Cheers
Stephen H. Cody
Microscopy
Manager
Central Resource for Advanced Microscopy
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
PO Box 2008
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Victoria,
3050
Australia
Tel: 61 3 9341
3155 Fax: 61 3 9341 3104
email: [hidden email]
www.ludwig.edu.au/labs/confocal.html
www.ludwig.edu.au/confocal
Tip: Learn how to receive reminders about you microscope
booking:
www.ludwig.edu.au/confocal/Local/Booking_Hint.htm
-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal
Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Urs Utzinger
Sent: Wednesday, 30 January 2008
2:41 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: DIC/phase through
spinning disk
Collecting transmitted light without a condenser using a point scanning system or spinning disk most likely results in “phase contrast like” images.
There are no software, phase rings or prisms required.
But Cody’s images in his publication seem to have better phase contrast then what I get with the method above.
Urs Utzinger
University of Arizona
From: Confocal
Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Christophe Leterrier
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008
5:56 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: DIC/phase through
spinning disk
Search the CONFOCAL
archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal But isn't
the transmitted light imaging non-confocal in a common confocal setup ? There
is a detector and no pinhole on the condenser side, so the transmitted image is
non-confocal, right ?
Christophe
On Jan 29, 2008 12:13 PM, Guy Cox <[hidden email]> wrote:
Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Well, I'm baffled. The QPm approach uses defocus contrast to calculate
phase shift. Confocal imaging should eliminate this. So I can't see how
this could work.
Guy
Optical Imaging Techniques in Cell Biology
by Guy Cox CRC Press / Taylor & Francis
http://www.guycox.com/optical.htm
______________________________________________
Associate Professor Guy Cox, MA, DPhil(Oxon)
Electron Microscope Unit, Madsen Building F09,
University of Sydney, NSW 2006
______________________________________________
Phone +61 2 9351 3176 Fax +61 2 9351 7682
Mobile 0413 281 861
______________________________________________
http://www.guycox.net
From: Confocal
Microscopy List on behalf of Stephen Cody
Sent: Tue 08/01/29 11:29 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: DIC/phase through spinning disk
Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
G'day David,
While I have not tried the following technique with spinning disk confocals, I have used it with brightfield images collected with "conventional point scanning" confocals, I think it should also work well with spinning disk systems.
If you have a "through focus" series of brightfield images you can calculate the DIC images (or phase, Hoffman etc, etc) using software called QPm (Or QPI) Developed by Keith A. Nugent et al., and supplied by iatia. See list of papers at www.iatia.com . You should be able to do this with any archival data you have saved to disk, provided it is a z-series of brightfield images.
You can see my paper specifically relating to QPm and confocal:
Cody, S.H., Xiang, S.D., Layton, M.J., Handman, E., Lam, M.H.C., Nice, E.C., and Heath, J.K. A simple method allows DIC imaging in conjunction with confocal microscopy. J. Microscopy. 217: 265-274 (2005).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2005.01452.x
Application note:
http://www.iatia.com.au/technology/applicationNotes/qpmApplicationWithConfocalMicroscopes.pdf
Other application notes:
http://www.iatia.com.au/technology/applicationNotes.asp
Cheers
Stephen H. Cody
Microscopy
Manager
Central Resource for Advanced Microscopy
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
PO Box 2008
Royal Melbourne Hospital
Victoria,
3050
Australia
Tel: 61 3 9341
3155 Fax: 61 3 9341 3104
email: [hidden email]
www.ludwig.edu.au/labs/confocal.html
www.ludwig.edu.au/confocal
Tip: Learn how to receive reminders about you microscope
booking:
www.ludwig.edu.au/confocal/Local/Booking_Hint.htm
-----Original
Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List
[mailto:[hidden email]]
On Behalf Of David Knecht
Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2008
11:58 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: DIC/phase through
spinning disk
We are in the process of putting together a spinning disk confocal system. We have heard mixed things about how acceptable it is to do transmitted light microscopy (DIC or Phase) through the spinning disk, as opposed to running a separate camera through a separate microscope port. What have others found?
Dr. David Knecht
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
Co-head Flow Cytometry and Confocal Microscopy Facility
U-3125
91 N. Eagleville Rd.
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CT 06269
860-486-2200
860-486-4331 (fax)
This communication is intended only for the named recipient and may
contain information that is confidential, legally privileged or subject to
copyright; the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research does not waiver any rights
if you have received this communication in error.
The views expressed in this communication are those of the sender and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research.
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |