Posted by
George McNamara on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Acquiring-a-multiphoton-system-some-questions-tp592485p592488.html
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Hi Jan,
If you get a Coherent Chameleon II with 3.3 Watts (average, my
recollection is that a 100 fs pulse repeated at 100 MHz is 1e6 higher
peak, so 200 fs pulses would be 5e5 peak) power - or its Spectra-Physics
equivalent - the depth limit is the burning smell of the surface of the
tissue (see also Kleinfeld and Tsien's laser ablation article, pubmed
12848930 - I'm curious whether they breathed the ablated
molecules).
Overall performance: NDD location (and PMT quality) and objective
lenses.
You may want to talk with Martin Kohler in Per-Olaf Berggren's group at
the Karolinska about intravital MP imaging. See
http://ki.se/ki/jsp/polopoly.jsp?l=sv&d=2061 (full disclosure: PO
also works at my location
http://www.diabetesresearch.org/AbouttheDRI/DRIFaculty/PerOlofBerggren.htm
from his lack of tan, the photo was probably taken at the beginning of
one of his visits).
Most people I've asked about pre-chirp have told me it is not worth the
bother. I've gone a about 1 mm into a freshly removed mouse brain
(Hoechst staining for a few minutes, did perfuse to get rid of the blood)
- I think the limit was either how far the (Zeiss 10x lens focused or how
much time we were willing to spend acquiring one field of view). A group
in the UK - see
Girkin JM, McConnell G.
Advances in laser sources for confocal and multiphoton microscopy.
Microsc Res Tech. 2005 May;67(1):8-14. Review.
PMID: 16025485
for example, is one of the few who are into short pulses (how many
diseases have they cured with it?). The other use of pre-chirp is with
LaVision Biotec's TriMScope, but it is for high speed calcium imaging not
deep tissue imaging.
At 04:28 PM 2/24/2008, you wrote:
Search the CONFOCAL archive
at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Dear all,
we are in the process of acquiring a multiphoton system intended
mainly for intravital imaging, and I have a couple of questions regarding
performance:
1. If I understand it correctly (correct me otherwise!), intensity
modulation using an AOM is a major source of chirp. At least one
manufacturer offers an alternative without AOM, which is said to improve
imaging depth. With the advent of pre-chirping, is this a relevant issue?
We would of course like the utility and bleaching capabilities afforded
by an AOM, but perhaps not if it significantly reduces the imaging
depth.
2. Connected to the above, to those of you that have experience with
pre-chirping. How much could we expect this to improve our imaging depth?
Is the improvement greater if we choose a laser with shorter pulses ~80fs
as compared to 140fs?
2. Since no manufacturer will give any hard numbers with regard to the
depth reach of their systems, we would like to be able to test this for
ourselves. Do you know of a test sample that can be made several hundred
um thick, that is or mimics some type of tissue, that has specific
fluorescent structures at various depths, and that preferably is stable
at least over some weeks. Are there commercially available MP test
samples?
A tall order maybe, but I´m hoping..
4. What components of the system do you feel are the most critical for
the overall performance. Is it the laser pulse shape, NDD performance,
obcectives, other??
All responses are appreciated!
Best regards,
Jan Grawé
Jan Grawé
Cell Analysis Core Facility
Rudbecklaboratoriet/C5
Dag hammarskjölds väg 20
SE-75185 Uppsala
SWEDEN
Phone: +(0)18-4714657
Cell: +(0)70-2577874
[hidden email]
www.rudbeck.uu.se/cellanalys
George McNamara, Ph.D.
University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine
Image Core
Miami, FL 33010
[hidden email]
[hidden email]
305-243-8436 office
http://home.earthlink.net/~pubspectra/
http://home.earthlink.net/~geomcnamara/
http://www.sylvester.org/research/SR_lab_analytical.asp?ana=desc
(Analytical Imaging Core Facility)