Re: Far-red filter set

Posted by Guy Cox on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Far-red-filter-set-tp592652p592671.html

Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Well, that depends where you are exciting.  I guess if you excite in the yellow
that could work but exciting at 640 rather rules it out.  I'm sure it is just a
sensitivity issue - I can see 750nm laser light easily enough.  And if you
have a cell layer or similar there will be enough glow around to find things.
But little bacteria are difficult.  We had 3 young men, I old man (me) and
1 young woman try and none of us could see them.   We had to find them
by phase - even that wasn't so easy since we'd worked hard to match
the refractive index!
 
                                                                                           Guy

Optical Imaging Techniques in Cell Biology
by Guy Cox    CRC Press / Taylor & Francis
    http://www.guycox.com/optical.htm
______________________________________________
Associate Professor Guy Cox, MA, DPhil(Oxon)
Electron Microscope Unit, Madsen Building F09,
University of Sydney, NSW 2006
______________________________________________
Phone +61 2 9351 3176     Fax +61 2 9351 7682
Mobile 0413 281 861
______________________________________________
     http://www.guycox.net

 


From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Waters
Sent: Saturday, 8 March 2008 5:07 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Far-red filter set

Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal Here's my guess:
While the peak intensity of Cy5 is not visible, it starts emitting (if you look at the spectra) around 620nm which most of us can see.  So if there is a high enough concentration of probe, the small percentage of photons that emit from Cy5 in the lower wavelengths will be detectable.
Jennifer



On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Michael Herron <[hidden email]> wrote:
A nice paper on it here for wide field:  http://www.jhc.org/cgi/reprint/48/3/437

The Jackson website discusses Cy5 a bit here: http://www.jacksonimmuno.com/technical/f-cy3-5.asp

On Mar 7, 2008, at 9:27 AM, Martin Wessendorf wrote:

Search the CONFOCAL archive at

George Ring wrote:

SUPPOSEDLY the human eye can see up to 700nm, and women can see longer wavelengths than men.  That said, I agree with the others who responded - I haven't met anyone who can see it.  A camera, however, or confocal can detect far red.

I think that the human eye has been shown to be capable of detecting photons out beyond 1000 nm--it's just the probability of detection gets pretty low.

--Based on my own lab's experience, I agree with Peter's comment--I haven't met many people who can't see Cy5, for instance.  However, intensity is all-important.  Filled cells that've been stained with Cy5-streptavidin are easy to see with a 20x 0.7 NA lens by eye and occasionally visible even at 4x.  However, smaller structures with weaker labeling (e.g. terminals) are much harder to see and even with brightly labeled cells, the details can get lost.

Re: IR filters on CCD cameras--they indeed can be deadly when trying to image far-red fluorophores!

Martin
-- 
Martin Wessendorf, Ph.D.                   office: (612) 626-0145
Assoc Prof, Dept Neuroscience                 lab: (612) 624-2991
University of Minnesota             Preferred FAX: (612) 624-8118
6-145 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St. SE    Dept Fax: (612) 626-5009
Minneapolis, MN  55455
**MY E-MAIL ADDRESS HAS CHANGED.  PLEASE USE [hidden email] **

Michael J. Herron,  U of MN, Dept. of Entomology
     612-624-3688 (office) 612-625-5299 (FAX)






--
Jennifer Waters, Ph.D.
Director, Nikon Imaging Center at Harvard Medical School

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.4/1309 - Release Date: 3/03/2008 6:50 PM


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.4/1309 - Release Date: 3/03/2008 6:50 PM