Re: help for optical table choice

Posted by Craig Brideau on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/help-for-optical-table-choice-tp593611p593613.html

Search the CONFOCAL archive at http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
If I might ask, what application were you using that you required active damping?  I haven't heard of this a whole lot outside of AFM and the semiconductor industry, although I see it is becoming more popular for highly sensitive applications.

Craig


On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 5:05 AM, Rietdorf, Jens <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hello Jean-Pierre,

we got excellent results with the TS series tables from
http://www.hwlscientific.com/ (no commercial interest) in an environment
where all kinds of passive dumping have failed. You may want to include
these into your evaluation.

Best, jens


-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On
Behalf Of Jean-Pierre CLAMME
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 12:20 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: help for optical table choice

Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi,

I'm shopping for an optical table for a new confocal / 2photon
microscope
and  FCS setup and I was wondering what kind of grade I need.
Indeed for the 2 photon microscope that we have here ((the new one is
for
another place) , we have  a TMC 784 series (maximum dry damping) table.
I
saw somewhere that this table is equivalent to the RS 4000 series from
NEWPORT.
So I was wondering if this grade is really necessary for a confocal
microscope and FCS system. Or if  as long as I have pneumatic legs, a
RS2000
or 783 (standard damping) would be fine ?

Thank you in advance,

JP