Re: Cotton wool for lens cleaning

Posted by Mark Cannell on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Cotton-wool-for-lens-cleaning-tp6175236p6180795.html

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

 From direct experience, I urge a note of caution with acetone, you  
may degrade the lens mounting glue and risk spreading it over the lens.

Regards Mark

On 17/03/2011, at 12:40 PM, Cammer, Michael wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> I don't think there really is one general solvent.  When I began  
> doing biological microscopy about 20 years ago the immersion oils  
> all seemed to be made of the same stuff and easily cleaned with just  
> about any organic solvent stronger than ethanol.  This is no longer  
> the case.  For instance, the new Nikon oil for TIRF gets thick and  
> is completely impervious to any of the aqueous cleaners.  It is  
> resistant to what we practically considered to be the universal  
> solvent of organics, acetone, and also to ethanol.  But dehydrated  
> methanol works great.  On the other hand, the Zeiss oils, when  
> fresh, clean up fine with their aqueous cleaning solutions and when  
> old and dripped all over the turret and such, with acetone.  The old  
> standby in the lab, Cargill Labs type DF, cleans up with any  
> inorganic solvent.  Of course, in one lab the gospel was xylene  
> because, well, we scientists tend to be superstitious or  
> traditional.  As for ether, one benefit of using it, we were told  
> years ago by someone at Zeiss, is that it evaporates so fast that it  
> reduces the chances of dissolving the glue holding in the front  
> glass of the objective.  Is this really a problem?  I've never had  
> one of these front lenses come loose.  Now I tend to use 1:1 acetone/
> methanol and cotton swabs and/or lens tissue following in the  
> footsteps of Spectraphysics service who uses this to clean their  
> mirrors and gives us average power of a Watt with 100 fs pulses at  
> 910-920 nm, so I follow by example.
> -Michael Cammer
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use  
> of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is  
> proprietary, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under  
> applicable law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or  
> distribution is prohibited. If you have received this email in error  
> please notify the sender by return email and delete the original  
> message. Please note, the recipient should check this email and any  
> attachments for the presence of viruses. The organization accepts no  
> liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this  
> email.
> =================================