http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Fluorophore-excitable-with-405nm-and-488nm-lines-tp6432486p6445988.html
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> *****
>
> Hang on, the requirement was for a sample which would measure the
> RELATIVE intensities of 505 and 488nm lasers. Mild bleaching shouldn't
> affect that. If a bit is seriously bleached, use another spot. A quick
> scan at very low power will reveal that. You're doing pretty well if
> you can bleach an entire slide in a lifetime - and it you do, the
> replacement is free. I've never succeeded in bleaching any part but I
> have managed to laser-ablate spots on the surface! As for RI mismatch -
> well of course there is. I'll bet there is with uranyl glass too (but
> in the opposite direction). But the killer with the U glass is that you
> can't actually see it very well in a scanned image. If you really want
> a solid-state unbleachable sample get a slice of emerald. I've never
> actually tried it at 405nm but it's so bright at 488 I'm sure it would
> work. Unless you have a very generous lab budget I would recommend the
> synthetic version over the natural one!
>
> Guy
>
>
> Optical Imaging Techniques in Cell Biology
> by Guy Cox CRC Press / Taylor & Francis
>
http://www.guycox.com/optical.htm> ______________________________________________
> Associate Professor Guy Cox, MA, DPhil(Oxon)
> Australian Centre for Microscopy & Microanalysis,
> Madsen Building F09, University of Sydney, NSW 2006
>
> Phone +61 2 9351 3176 Fax +61 2 9351 7682
> Mobile 0413 281 861
> ______________________________________________
>
http://www.guycox.net>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:
[hidden email]]
> On Behalf Of Cammer, Michael
> Sent: Friday, 3 June 2011 9:00 PM
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: Re: Fluorophore excitable with 405nm and 488nm lines
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> *****
>
> Depending on your tolerance, they may or may not be stable. I use these
> all the time for aligning the microscope because they are great for
> this, although there may be an issue with refractive index mismatch
> especially with the newer TIRF objectives, but I'm not so sure as a
> reproducible sample.
> Please see
>
http://www.einstein.yu.edu/aif/instructions/fluor-ref-slides/01.htm and
>
http://www.einstein.yu.edu/aif/instructions/zeiss/liveduo/Zaxis_bleachin> gtest/index.htm
> for two examples of bleaching.
> -Michael
>
> _________________________________________
> Michael Cammer, Assistant Research Scientist
> Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine
> Lab: (212) 263-3208 Cell: (914) 309-3270
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Confocal Microscopy List [
[hidden email]] On
> Behalf Of Guy Cox [
[hidden email]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 11:32 PM
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: Re: Fluorophore excitable with 405nm and 488nm lines
>
> I just checked out a Chroma green fluorescent plastic slide - it seemed
> to fluoresce pretty well with both uv and blue LEDs so surely that
> should work well enough. Doesn't have the ultra-long lifetime problem
> of uranyl glass. Reproducible, robust and best of all free!
>
> Guy
>
> Optical Imaging Techniques in Cell Biology
> by Guy Cox CRC Press / Taylor & Francis
>
http://www.guycox.com/optical.htm> ______________________________________________
> Associate Professor Guy Cox, MA, DPhil(Oxon)
> Australian Centre for Microscopy & Microanalysis,
> Madsen Building F09, University of Sydney, NSW 2006
>
> Phone +61 2 9351 3176 Fax +61 2 9351 7682
> Mobile 0413 281 861
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is
> proprietary, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is
> prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the
> sender by return email and delete the original message. Please note, the
> recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence
> of viruses. The organization accepts no liability for any damage caused
> by any virus transmitted by this email.
> =================================
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1511/3677 - Release Date: 06/03/11
>