http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Pulse-compression-and-in-vivo-imaging-tp6557894p6563178.html
Heh. That was quick for the commercial response. @:-) Some of the adaptive
optics companies, like these guys, have drop-in systems. I haven't
easy to add to existing setups. It is interesting how quickly the
commercial implementation of AO has progressed. It has gone from lab-only to
fast add-on within a couple years. I guess everyone is hoping that adaptive
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> *****
>
> Hello Stephane,
>
> My company, Imagine Optic, manufactures high performance Adaptive Optics
> loops and we have lots of experience and very good results in microscopy,
> especially non-linear microscopy and super resolution.
>
> You can go to
>
>
http://www.imagine-optic.com/iop_applications_adaptive-optics_microscopy-lif> e-sciences_en.php to see some images.
>
> To avoid too commercial language on the list, I will send you a private
> email.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Philippe Clémenceau, Division Manager
>
> Imagine Optic Inc./Axiom Optics
> Ph:+1 (617) 401 2198
> Cell: + 1 (310) 597 1347
> 1 Broadway, 14th floor
> Fax: +1(425) 930 9818
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> www.imagine-optic.com
>
> Scientific Imaging , Laser Characterization & Laser based NDT
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:
[hidden email]]
> On
> Behalf Of Stéphane Pagès
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 4:23 AM
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: Re: Pulse compression and in vivo imaging
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> *****
>
> Thanks Craig,
> Are you aware of some commercial optical adaptive systems easily
> implementable on a 2-P microscope ?
> or is the technology still in development in labs ?
>
>
>
> 2011/7/7 Craig Brideau <
[hidden email]>
>
> > *****
> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> >
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> > *****
> >
> > If scattering is the issue then adaptive optics will be more advantageous
> > than dispersion control. The adaptive optics will help compensate
> somewhat
> > for the scattering and aberrations induced by the tissue. To get good 2P
> > imaging you need a good focal spot more-so than you need a perfectly
> > transform limited pulse. Adaptive optics will help keep your focus
> > together
> > as you try to image deeply. That said, dispersion compensation will help
> > somewhat so if you already have the necessary equipment then try it.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Stéphane Pagès <
> >
[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > *****
> > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> > >
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> > > *****
> > >
> > > Hi everybody,
> > > I am planning to image fluorescent neurons in vivo approximately 200
> um
> > > below the pia with a standard Ti:Sa laser.
> > > I wonder if there is a clear advantage to use pulse compression to
> > > compensate for dispersion of pulses due to tissue.
> > > I understand theoretical arguments in favor of pulse compression.
> > > However from an experimental point of view, are there some people here
> in
> > > the list that have experienced some gain (in lowering the intensity of
> > the
> > > exciting beam for example).
> > > Any comments would be greatly appreciated.
> > > Thanks a lot
> > > Stephane
> > >
> >
>
> -----
> Aucun virus trouvé dans ce message.
> Analyse effectuée par AVG - www.avg.fr
> Version: 10.0.1388 / Base de données virale: 1516/3750 - Date: 07/07/2011
>