Re: worth paying for service contract on Olympus Fluoview confocal?

Posted by Rosemary.White on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/worth-paying-for-service-contract-on-Olympus-Fluoview-confocal-tp6592259p6592883.html

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

We have a Leica SP2 which has always been under a full service contract in
its nearly 11-year life.  If your contract covers all parts including
lasers, which the cost would seem to indicate, it's well worth it in the
long run.  
cheers,
Rosemary

Dr Rosemary White
CSIRO Plant Industry
GPO Box 1600
Canberra, ACT 2601
Australia

T 61 2 6246 5475
F 61 2 6246 5334
E [hidden email]


On 18/07/11 3:58 AM, "Julian Smith III" <[hidden email]> wrote:

>*****
>To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>*****
>
>We have an FV1000 and carry a contract for the confocal, but not the
>lasers.  Your quote seems high, so does that $20k also cover the lasers?
>
>We average around 750 user hours per year; I'd guess you could add
>10-15% to that number and get the total number of "on" hours/year.
>Do you need a contract?  It depends
>1. Rated lifetime on the lasers is accurate, or perhaps a slight
>over-estimate.  I was foolishly running the system 24x5 during the first
>18months (newbie error), and we went through both the 405LD and the
>568DPSS.  They were replaced under the  warranty that came with the
>instrument.  The engineer went ahead and replaced the 488 gas laser at
>the same time, as he wasn't satisfied with the output.  My dean and
>chair know that we'll eventually need to pay to replace the lasers again.
>2. Aside from having a computer card replaced (again under the two-year
>initial warranty), a computer monitor replaced, and routine annuals and
>maintenance software upgrades, we've had no problems with the system.
>Unfortunately, I have absolutely no idea what it would have cost to do
>these things off-contract.
>
>I plan to keep the contract.  We're a small PUI  with a sizeable
>quantity of undergrad research going on, the confocal is rather heavily
>used, and we can't afford to have it down for three weeks while I wait
>for a non-contract service call.  I also don't have time to try to learn
>to fix it myself.
>
>Julian
>
>On 7/17/11 12:38 PM, Vernita Gordon wrote:
>> *****
>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>> *****
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am a new assistant professor still settling into my lab (and still
>>working
>> entirely off startup funds).  A little less than a year ago, I bought an
>> Olympus Fluoview laser-scanning confocal microscope.  This came with a
>> one-year service contract.  Renewing that service contract for next year
>> will cost $20k.
>>
>> We don't do very demanding things on this confocal and so far haven't
>>had
>> problems with it.  My question is, does anyone have perspective on
>>whether
>> paying for this service contract is worthwhile?
>>
>> I am leaning toward not doing so and hoping things continue to go well,
>>but
>> this is also my first time working with an Olympus confocal and I don't
>>have
>> a good sense for whether or not I should expect problems (and, if they
>> arise, if they're likely to cost more than $20k to fix).
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Vernita
>>
>
>
>--
>Julian P.S. Smith III
>Director, Winthrop Microscopy Facility
>Dept. of Biology
>Winthrop University
>520 Cherry Rd.
>Rock Hill, SC  29733
>
>803-323-2111 x6427 (vox)
>803-323-3448 (fax)
>803-524-2347 (cell)
>Research Website www.birdnest.org/smithj
>Personal Website www.rociada-east.net