Re: Quantum yield

Posted by Craig Brideau on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Rejected-posting-to-CONFOCALMICROSCOPY-LISTS-UMN-EDU-tp6866064p6870080.html

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

That's a pretty neat method!  It avoids having to worry about figuring out
photon flux by calibrating against a known.  Where would you get trustworthy
QE calibration standards though?

Craig

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Unruh, Jay <[hidden email]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> In order to measure quantum yields by the reference method, one only needs
> a defined measurement volume, a standard dye of known absorbance (at the
> microscope excitation wavelength) and quantum yield, and the absorbance of
> your sample at the microscope excitation wavelength.  Quantum yield is then
> defined as QY=QYstandard*(A/Astandard) *(Fstandard/F)*(n^2/nstandard^2).
>  Here n is the refractive index, F is the measured fluorescence intensity
> and A is the absorbance at the microscope excitation wavelength.  Note that
> it is important that the standard and your unknown have similar emission
> spectra.  Otherwise you will have to correct for the wavelength dependence
> of your microscope detection efficiency.  Of course, if you have enough
> sample to measure absorbance, you can also measure fluorescence in a cuvette
> and then there is no point in going to the microscope.
>
> Jay
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]]
> On Behalf Of Guy Cox
> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 8:44 PM
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: Quantum yield
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> I got a rather left field enquiry today, as to whether there were
> calibration standards for quantum yield.  It seems that the person wants to
> measure quantum yield under the microscope.  My immediate response was that
> this is impossible.  Quantum yield is easy enough to measure in a cuvette
> but would it be possible in a microscope?  You could make a standard of a
> known concentration of fluorescein in a cell made by a
> spacer under the coverslip, but where do you go from there, if   both
> quantum yield and extinction coefficient of the test sample are unknown?
>
> Any bright ideas?
>
>                                          Guy
>
>
>
>
> Optical Imaging Techniques in Cell Biology
> by Guy Cox    CRC Press / Taylor & Francis
>     http://www.guycox.com/optical.htm
> ______________________________________________
> Associate Professor Guy Cox, MA, DPhil(Oxon) Australian Centre for
> Microscopy & Microanalysis, Madsen Building F09, University of Sydney, NSW
> 2006
>
> Phone +61 2 9351 3176     Fax +61 2 9351 7682
>             Mobile 0413 281 861
> ______________________________________________
>      http://www.guycox.net
>
>