Posted by
Neeraj Gohad-2 on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/A-digital-microscope-for-kids-any-recommendations-tp7082751p7086895.html
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy*****
Hi John,
While traveling I 'have always noticed these toy microscopes in the Sky Mall in-flight magazine. If you go to www.skymall.com and search 'microscope' they have couple of them to choose from.
As always, no commercial interest!
Best,
Neeraj.
Neeraj V. Gohad, Ph.D.
Research Assistant Professor
Department of Biological Sciences
132 Long Hall
Clemson University
Clemson,SC-29634
Phone: 864-656-3597
Fax: 864-656-0435
-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Glen MacDonald
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 11:41 AM
To:
[hidden email]
Subject: Re: A digital microscope for kids - any recommendations?
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy*****
Hi John,
The Brock Magiscope mentioned by Nico is a nice durable design with good optics. The plastic light pipe is very clever, just point it at any light source. It works tolerably well for macro samples. The other approach for that age would be a simple dissecting scope. It can use a variety of light sources with a wider range of samples, and the boy's clever uncle could arrange to transilluminate thin specimens. Flexibility and durability are key at this age. Go for a better quality compound scope when he is older.
Regards,
Glen
Glen MacDonald
Core for Communication Research
Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center Box 357923 University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195-7923 USA
(206) 616-4156
[hidden email]
On Dec 10, 2011, at 7:42 PM, John Oreopoulos wrote:
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> *****
>
> Hello list server,
>
> This is not a confocal question, but I figure the people here might have some good experience with this. I have a 7-year old nephew who says he wants to find a cure cancer someday. I figure the best Christmas gift for him this year would therefore be a decent children's microscope. My problem is that there seems to be hundreds of different kids microscope brands, some with just eyepieces, some that can be interfaced to a computer via USB, etc. Does anyone here have any recommendations for one model brand over another?
>
> Ron Vale makes a good argument for having kids go straight to digital microscopes instead of using eyepieces (and many modern research grade microscopes don't require eyepieces either):
>
>
http://microscopy4kids.org/>
http://microscopy4kids.org/webpage/pages/whydiglookma.html>
> My only issue with this is that my nephew does not have access to a computer of his own. I think what would be better is a kids microscope that hooks up to a television screen directly, and these do exist. For example:
>
>
http://www.bonpal.com/product/usb-microscope/bp-m8200t.html> (no commercial interest)
>
> And the other great thing about a pocket TV microscope like that is that it has a built in LED light source. So, what do you think? This is isn't so different from when list server members ask for opinions on various confocal microscopes, is it? Commercial responses offline to me are welcome as well.
>
> Thanks, and a happy upcoming winter holiday to all confocalists out there!
>
>
> John Oreopoulos
> Research Assistant
> Spectral Applied Research
> Richmond Hill, Ontario
> Canada
> www.spectral.ca