Posted by
mmodel on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Concentrating-bacteria-cells-for-microscope-visualization-tp6519025p7134081.html
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy*****
I use fluorescent multicolor beads on a coverslip. But even before, I have noticed that when I am looking at cells in transmission, I see different things depending on the filter. You may argue that with cells, there is spherical aberration, etc but with beads there shouldn't be any. So I thought that perhaps low-NA objectives are generally less well corrected for longitudinal chromatic aberration? Even when of the planapo type. Olympus does not provide any numbers, just says that the objectives are 'excellent".
-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Martin Wessendorf
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 4:26 PM
To:
[hidden email]
Subject: Re: chromatic aberration
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy*****
How are you measuring the aberration? Beads? Reflectance?
On 12/28/2011 2:46 PM, MODEL, MICHAEL wrote:
> Olympus. Their higher-NA objectives are fine
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Martin Wessendorf
> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 3:25 PM
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: Re: chromatic aberration
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> *****
>
> Hey, Mike--
>
> On 12/28/2011 2:01 PM, MODEL, MICHAEL wrote:
>
>> Both of our 10/0.4 planapo objectives have a bad longitudinal chromatic aberration between blue and far red (2.5 um axial shift with correct coverslip). Is this normal for low-power objectives?
>
> What manufacturer? Not to trash any particular brand but I've seen
> problems that bad on 60x oil objectives from some makers and would
> expect a 10x objective to be even worse.
>
> Martin
--
Martin Wessendorf, Ph.D. office: (612) 626-0145
Assoc Prof, Dept Neuroscience lab: (612) 624-2991
University of Minnesota Preferred FAX: (612) 624-8118
6-145 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St. SE Dept Fax: (612) 626-5009
Minneapolis, MN 55455 e-mail:
[hidden email]