Pin-hole issue in disk vs. line scanning confocal
Posted by
O'Malley, Donald on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Pin-hole-issue-in-disk-vs-line-scanning-confocal-tp7567859.html
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy*****
The point was made that 5 mW is a lot of laser power. With live specimens it is extremely useful to trade off some optical sectioning by gradually opening the "pinhole" aperture-- this allows one to operate at much lower light intensities, and can easily be done in the course of live imaging experiments with most line-scanning confocals (i.e. aperture can be adjusted without disturbing the specimen on the microscope stage). With the fixed pinhole size of disk scanners, which are designed to maximize spatial resolution, a large laser power is required, which is not ideal for extended live cell/animal imaging experiments.
My question is if commercial disk scanners have a set of disks allowing one to switch to larger apertures, and if this trade-off can be made "on-line", i.e. in between successive acquisitions on a sample? I would especially appreciate a pointer to any peer-reviewed publications on this topic.
Best Regards,
Don
Don O'Malley
Assoc. Professor
Dept. Biology
[hidden email]<mailto:
[hidden email]>
617-373-2284