Re: Light reading on optical nanoscopy

Posted by Peng Xi-2 on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Light-reading-on-optical-nanoscopy-tp7578894p7578905.html

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Oh my dear, I will be driven crazy Alby... I cannot read Germany. But I
will surely list it there. :)
Peng

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Alberto Diaspro <[hidden email]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> i propose confining this discussion to the far-field...what about the
> ultramicroscope?
> Siedentopf, H., & Zsigmondy, R. (1902). Uber Sichtbarmachung und
> Größenbestimmung ultramikoskopischer Teilchen, mit besonderer Anwendung auf
> Goldrubingläser. Annalen der Physik, 315(1), 1–39.
> Il giorno 23/ago/2012, alle ore 10:17, Guy Cox <[hidden email]> ha
> scritto:
>
> > *****
> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> > *****
> >
> > Apart from Mark's suggestions, Synge proposed near-field microscopy in
> 1928 (Philosophical Magazine 6, 356).  It was first demonstrated in visible
> light in 1984 (D.W. Pohl, W. Denk, and M. Lanz (1984). "Optical
> stethoscopy: Image recording with resolution λ/20". Appl. Phys. Lett. 44
> (7): 651.) though it had been achieved in the microwave region as early as
> 1972.  This is all way before the concept of STED had even been proposed
> (1994) let alone demonstrated (2002).
> >
> > It's not fair to say that only 'unlimited' methods are true
> super-resolution.  Both 4-pi (proposed by Cremer & Cremer in 1971) and
> linear structured illumination are generally regarded (and marketed) as
> super-resolution.  Linear structured illumination was demonstrated two
> years before STED (Gustafsson, M.G.L.  2000  Surpassing the lateral
> resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination
> microscopy. Journal of Microscopy 198 (2) , pp. 82-87).  I5 microscopy,
> another technique offering substantial but not unlimited super-resolution,
> was achieved even earlier (Gustafsson, Agard & Sedat, Journal of
> Microscopy, 195, 10-16, 1999).
> >
> >                                              Guy
> >
> > Optical Imaging Techniques in Cell Biology
> > by Guy Cox   2nd edition, 2012 CRC Press
> >      http://www.guycox.com/optical.htm
> > ______________________________________________
> > Associate Professor Guy Cox, MA, DPhil(Oxon)
> > Aust. Centre for Microscopy & Microanalysis, F09,
> > University of Sydney, NSW 2006
> > ______________________________________________
> > Phone +61 2 9351 3176     Fax +61 2 9351 7682
> > Mobile 0413 281 861
> > ______________________________________________
> >       http://www.guycox.net
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]]
> On Behalf Of Peng Xi
> > Sent: Thursday, 23 August 2012 4:59 PM
> > To: [hidden email]
> > Subject: Re: Light reading on optical nanoscopy
> >
> > *****
> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> > *****
> >
> > Dear Mark,
> >    I am not sure what you mean by "well before". Super-resolution is a
> > term that usually refers to techniques that provides theoretically
> > 'infinitely small' resolution, or down to single molecule size. That's
> why
> > although confocal is already better (1.4x better) in resolution, it is
> > generally not treated as super-resolution. And so to multiphoton
> microscopy.
> >   If you have a better candidate on inventing super-resolution, please
> let
> > me and everybody know. I am sure that people are keen to know this.
> >
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Peng Xi
> > Ph. D.    Associate Professor
> > Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering
> > Peking University, Beijing, China
> > Tel: +86 10-6276 7155
> > Email: [hidden email]
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Mark Cannell
> > <[hidden email]>wrote:
> >
> >> *****
> >> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> >> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> >> *****
> >>
> >> Hmm, A very myopic blog on a subject with a rich past.  It was
> appreciated
> >> that the Abbe 'limit' was not a limit well before Stephan Hell's work.
> >> Suggest you might like to research the subject matter a bit deeper?
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> PS I hope others don't start advertising their  'blogs' on this list, we
> >> ban commercial 'blogs', perhaps this should be extend?
> >>
> >>
> >> On 23/08/2012, at 1:32 AM, Peng Xi <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> *****
> >>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> >>> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> >>> *****
> >>>
> >>> Dear List,
> >>>    I am blogging on optical nanoscopy, in a very casual mode.
> >>>
> >>
> http://xipeng.wordpress.com/2012/08/16/how-optical-super-resolution-is-achieved-1/
> >>>    It is originally written in Chinese, after I gave a related plenary
> >>> talk in May 2012. Last talk, in the noon time. And the audiences were
> >> from
> >>> all sorts of disciplines, from fresh graduate students to renowned
> >>> professors. Therefore, I decided to make the talk interesting, and easy
> >> to
> >>> follow by everyone. It turns out to be very successful -- much better
> >> than
> >>> equations and diagrams. So, I decide to broadcast it by blogging. :)
> >>>    Hope you like it.
> >>>
> >>> Sincerely,
> >>> Peng Xi
> >>> Ph. D.    Associate Professor
> >>> Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering
> >>> Peking University, Beijing, China
> >>> Tel: +86 10-6276 7155
> >>> Email: [hidden email]
> >>
> >> Mark  B. Cannell Ph.D. FRSNZ
> >> Professor of Cardiac Cell Biology
> >> School of Physiology&  Pharmacology
> >> Medical Sciences Building
> >> University of Bristol
> >> Bristol
> >> BS8 1TD UK
> >>
> >> [hidden email]
> >>
>