Login  Register

Re: Colocalization on Z-stack images

Posted by Marjan Gharagozloo on May 21, 2013; 1:13pm
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Colocalization-on-Z-stack-images-tp7580319p7580349.html

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Dear Philippe, Julio, and all confocal members,

Thank you so much for your kind reply and valuable information. I'd
like to know is Huygens professional is good for 3D colocalization
analysis. It's the first time that I'm using it, it seems good but I
don't know if the data is reliable enough for publication.

Many thanks
Marjan

On 5/19/13, phil laissue <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Dear Marjan,
>
> apologies for the delay, I have been away on annual leave.
> It is hard to tell from your description what might work best, since I
> don't know what the structures are. In any case, you need something
> that gives you good values in 3D. It is tempting to flatten the
> z-stack, then do a Pearson's or something similar, but that is bad
> practice, as you are ignoring the third dimension (z). Look which ones
> do proper 3D. coloc2 (in Fiji), is a good one. The object-based Moore
> plugin (http://crg.ubc.ca/moore/) looks also good, although I haven't
> tried it myself. If the structures you're looking at are round(ish),
> then I must say that I have been very happy with the algorithm we have
> produced. This will also give you a clear picture depending on the
> z-level (e.g. if the structures colocalise more outside or inside the
> nucleus) and the distances between the structures. I don't have the
> paper here, but can send it to you tomorrow; the plugin requires
> Matlab. Maybe, if it strongly depends on the z-level, it may be a
> good-enough start to look at single planes from different z-levels
> (using a 2D approach, e.g. Manders or Pearsons) and show that they are
> very different.
> Colocalisation is a tricky subject - I've ended up spending a lot more
> time on it than I ever thought I would.
>
> Let me know if this helps; if not, just get back to me, I'm now back at
> work.
>
> With kind regards
>
> Philippe
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Marjan Gharagozloo <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>> Dear Philippe,
>>
>> Thank you so much for your reply. I'm looking for RNA translocation
>> inside nucleus. The RNA has been labeled with Cy3 and Nuclei are
>> stained with Draq5. This is my first confocal experience and I'm
>> really confused! My problem is that the quantity of colocalization is
>> changing by different focal plane. So, I tried looking at Z-stacks to
>> find something reliable. I used Zeiss software for Colocalization (LSM
>> 710), I got some data but I'm not happy with them because I'm not sure
>> if they are showing the correct amount of colocalization. Then, I
>> checked imageJ, actually I found Many ImageJ software online
>> (Imagej2X, WCIF ImageJ, and just ImageJ). Also I downloaded Huygens
>> and Volocity 3D, but I couldn't find something related to my need.
>>
>> Could you kindly tell me which one is more relevant to my case? Any
>> suggestion would be highly appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Bests
>> Marjan
>>
>>
>> On 5/8/13, phil laissue <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> *****
>>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>>> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>>> *****
>>>
>>> Hi Marjan,
>>>
>>> more information would be needed to understand the problem, but I'm
>>> pasting in a few references below. If you have a z-stack, the best
>>> option is to do a 3D colocalisation analysis by including all focal
>>> planes (hopefully you acquired using Nyquist-Shannon reconstruction
>>> theorem).
>>>
>>> (from an earlier post):
>>> By no means a comprehensive list, but in my humble opinion some of the
>>> most user-friendly discussions/approaches. Really depends on the
>>> structures in question, there's not one single approach that works
>>> best.
>>>
>>> pixel-based:
>>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23026999
>>> diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:563664/FULLTEXT02
>>> coloc2:
>>> http://fiji.sc/Colocalization_Analysis
>>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21209361
>>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15189895
>>> object-based:
>>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20858446
>>> http://crg.ubc.ca/moore/
>>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19746416
>>>
>>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23381680
>>> (happy to send you reprint and matlab code)
>>>
>>> Also worth checking out:
>>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17210054
>>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22086768
>>>
>>> Hope this helps. Kind regards
>>>
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>> ______________________________
>>> Philippe Laissue, PhD, Bioimaging Manager
>>> School of Biological Sciences, Room 4.17
>>> University of Essex, Colchester CO4 3SQ, UK
>>> (0044) 01206 872246 / (0044) 07842 676 456
>>> [hidden email]
>>> privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~plaissue
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Marjan Gharagozloo <[hidden email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> *****
>>>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>>>> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>>>> *****
>>>>
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to study colocalization of Draq5 and Cy3 in Nucleus.
>>>> Actually, this topic is totally new to me and I've read many articles
>>>> and
>>>> manuals to find a way for quantifying colocalization. However, I don't
>>>> know how I can analyze colocalization in my Zstack images. I know by
>>>> changing focal plane, I'll get different results and quantities. It's
>>>> kind of you if send me some information to do this analysis.
>>>>
>>>> Many thanks and best regards:
>>>> Marjan
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards:
>>>>
>>>> Marjan Gharagozloo (PhD)
>>>> Postdoctoral Fellow
>>>> University of Waterloo
>>>> School of Pharmacy, PHR3002
>>>> 10 Victoria St S, N2G 2B2
>>>> Kitchener, ON, Canada
>