http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/lysosomal-live-cell-markers-tp7581040p7581047.html
LysoTracker. Because it's an enzyme substrate, it will accumulate in the
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> *****
>
> Hi all-
>
> I will be doing a series of experiments that involves tracking lysosomes
> by
> live-cell microscopy over 1-24 hours. I took a look at the listserv
> archives and hadn't seen much recently on the topic of live cell lysosomal
> markers. While LysoTracker has been a standard for a while, my
> understanding is that there are potential pitfalls, including purported
> photoswitching from red to green with LysoTracker is excited, potential
> toxicity, lack of specificity to lysosome (rather than just all acidic
> compartments), and low fluorescence levels.
>
> Compared to LysoTracker, how are some of the other non-FP based methods
> for
> live-cell lysosomal tracking? I'd be curious to hear thoughts on Enzo's
> Lyso-ID, MarkerGene's LysoLive lysosomal sulfatase kit, Abcam's
> CytoPainter
> lysosomal kit, AAT's LysoBrite (which they claim is much more photostable
> and less toxic than LysoTracker), Magic Red detection of cathepsin B
> activity, or preloading cells with fluorescently labeled dextrans?
>
> I'm specifically interested in:
> a) specificity of labeling
> b) toxicity
> c) photostability (resistance to bleaching and photoconversion)
> d) how long the label lasts if I were to do a prolonged time-course
> experiment (e.g. 24 hours)?
>
> Thanks so much for your insights in advance.
>
> -Jason Miller
>
> --
>
> Jason Miller, MD, PhD
>
> University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center
>
> E-mail: *
[hidden email] *
>
>
> The first thing which I can record concerning myself is, that I was born.
> These are wonderful words. This life, to which neither time nor eternity
> can bring diminution - this everlasting living soul, began. My mind loses
> itself in these depths. -- Groucho Marx
>