http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Brightness-difference-Hg-vs-LED-tp7581211p7581217.html
except possibly at the very brightest mercury peaks (365, 546 nm). For
GFP, they are for sure brighter. True LEDs have been somewhat dim in
those wavelengths. This gives very bright 560 emission.
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> *****
>
> Hi Phil I would say that the new LED sources and Light Engines will be brighter than mercury sources. For example I compared an Exfo to a SOLA light engine and the light engine is brighter. The new Lumen Dynamics XLED should provide much better illumination than a mercury source.
> Hopefully, mercury sources will soon be a thing of the past.
> Cheers,
>
> Brian D Armstrong PhD
> Associate Research Professor
> Director, Light Microscopy Core
> Beckman Research Institute
> City of Hope
> Dept of Neuroscience
> 1450 E Duarte Rd
> Duarte, CA 91010
> 626-256-4673 x62872
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:
[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Philip Oshel
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2013 9:57 AM
> To:
[hidden email]
> Subject: Brightness difference Hg vs LED
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> *****
>
> All,
>
> I had this question put to me by a new faculty member, and don't have a
> ready answer:
> "Is there a ballpark percentage for how much less bright an LED vs a
> standard mercury lamp light?"
> This is for regular epifluorescence, not confocal.
>
> This is in the realm of arm-waving over a picture of beer (a good, dark
> stout), ignoring brands, how old the Hg bulb is, ex/em cubes, which part
> of the spectrum is used, and all that. Personally, I'd think the answer
> is more like, "Doesn't matter, the dimmer system is still too bright to
> use all the available light and not damage the specimen." But ... ?
>
> Phil