Re: Bioimaging in Genoa - Open access - Great Talks, No women ?

Posted by Csúcs Gábor-3 on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Re-Bioimaging-in-Genoa-Open-access-Great-Talks-No-women-tp7584302p7584361.html

Dear All,

With all the respect to all the people who were so far involved in this discussion - would it be possible to stop it right now?
I would suggest that you continue it directly or establish a new mailing list dedicated to the subject.

Thanks      Gabor


-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Johannes Schindelin
Sent: Dienstag, 13. Oktober 2015 13:37
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Bioimaging in Genoa - Open access - Great Talks, No women ?

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Alberto,

On 2015-10-13 08:10, Alberto Diaspro wrote:

> Dear

His name is Jeremy.

> I decided to reply since you are mentioning me.
> I think that your email is “self commenting”.  I really do not
> understand your points.
> Are you full of anger? are you frustrated for something? They missed
> you in the Nobel prize nominations? I do not understand.

I have to admit that I was utterly shocked to see this statement.

It is bad and sad enough that respected leaders in science do not see any problem with announcing ~100% male speaker line-ups. And it is not the first time, but seems to repeat itself over and over and over again.

It is also quite distressing for me to see that you did not even feel the need to reply to the concerns brought to you in a timely manner.

But then to go on and *belittle* somebody who mustered enough courage to voice his opinion? This is appalling.

If anything, it is proof to me that there is a serious lack of empathy in science. I perceived this response as just a bullyish method to discourage dissent.

But maybe this is just a cunning strategy to demonstrate the dear need to balance out the gender inequality in science's higher ranks?

> From my side, I apologise for stopping to reply on this topic. If
> there is something wrong I did, please write me and we can discuss
> about it. I am sorry to say that my impression is that you look like
> the “only real victim” of yourself.

No, the real victim is science. Good, decent, polite scientists are driven out of science by the problem that elicited this email thread.

I hope that a few will remain.

Ciao,
Johannes