Re: 3d printers for microsocpy

Posted by Vladimir Ghukasyan-2 on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/3d-printers-for-microsocpy-tp7585214p7585223.html

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hello Gary,

Here's the information I was referencing:
http://hackaday.com/2016/04/28/the-makerbot-obituary/

So, yes, they may still be continuing the production, but that would be
something else, they closed their factory, cut lots of jobs, and move the
manufacturing to China.

Vladimir


On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Gary Laevsky <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> As an FYI, in response to an inquiry to Makerbot, they are very much in
> business still.
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:18 AM, Vladimir Ghukasyan <
> [hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > *****
> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> > Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> posting.
> > *****
> >
> > Hi Aryeh,
> >
> > You have an option to go to filament extruder printers or
> stereolithography
> > printers. First group as you probably already know, melt a thermoplastic
> > filament and extrudes it in a particular layout. In stereolithography a
> > laser is polymerizing a curable resin. We tried the Makerbot Replicator 2
> > for the filament printers (FDM). It was ok, but wasn't easy to handle.
> This
> > is a high-maintenance printer and tends to break a lot. You need to
> figure
> > out the settings for different details, so we have got many bad
> prototypes
> > with it. Makerbot is now out of business - they stopped manufacturing 3D
> > printers. We recently bought a Form2 SLA printer and are very happy with
> > it. It provides with a high-resolution nice finish details and you get to
> > vary the mechanical properties with the resin - Formlabs, the
> manufacturers
> > of Form2 offer a variety of different formulations - Tough resin with
> good
> > tensile strength, Flexible resin for squishy parts, a range of standard
> > plastics, and a Dental resin - a biocompatible one. A disadvantage here
> is
> > that cured resin tends to change mechanical properties and become
> brittle.
> > This, however, is what theory says and we have not seen this as of yet
> > (this will probably affect the parts over the course of years). Another
> > consideration is the cost of the resins - you will need to spend ~$150/l
> of
> > resin. To give you an example, we printed a model of fly brain with the
> > size of approx. 3''x2''. That model consumed 90ml.  So for big parts -
> this
> > is not practical. For smaller parts or parts that require high precision
> I
> > would trust the SLA more. The cost is reasonable ($3400) and the customer
> > service is good.
> >
> > If you want to choose an FDM printer, please consider a review made by
> the
> > Make magazine. We found the ratings they do pretty reliable and
> thoroughly
> > made (http://makezine.com/comparison/3dprinters/). According to their
> > review, LulzBot is very good along with the Zortrax. A Maker facility
> here
> > on campus has bought LulzBot and was very happy with it - it appeared to
> be
> > very reliable. The printer that Alexander mentioned is very tempting, but
> > is much more costly.
> >
> > Good luck with your printing.
> > Vladimir
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Alexander Cramer <[hidden email]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > *****
> > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> > > Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> > posting.
> > > *****
> > >
> > > Greetings Aryeh,
> > >
> > > We employ two different types of 3D printers for creating parts and 3D
> > > models at
> > > the University Imaging Centers at the University of Minnesota.
> > >
> > > We have a couple a MakerBot Replicators for simple parts that have
> worked
> > > relatively will for our users needs and our own, but we've also very
> > > recently added
> > > a MarkForge II (https://markforged.com) for stronger parts.
> > >
> > > It prints using Nylon as it's base material but then has a second
> > extruder
> > > that adds
> > > a fiber filament such as Carbon Fiber, Kevlar, or Fiber Glass for added
> > > part
> > > strength.
> > >
> > > You do have the option to just print in Nylon too which is quite useful
> > > even without
> > > fiber reinforcement.
> > >
> > > Both printers are pretty affordable which was a key point for our core
> > > since we
> > > have just entered the world of 3D printing.
> > >
> > > Word to the wise if you do purchase a MakerBot of any model- Make sure
> it
> > > has the
> > > new Smart Extruder +. Any of the older models are woefully inadequate
> and
> > > will
> > > give you nothing but headaches.
> > >
> > > If you have any questions just let me know, happy to answer what I can.
> > >
> > > Alex
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best,
>
> Gary Laevsky, Ph.D.
> Director, Confocal Imaging Facility
> Nikon Center of Excellence
> Dept. of Molecular Biology
> Washington Rd.
> Princeton University
> Princeton, New Jersey, 08544-1014
> (O) 609 258 5432
> (C) 508 507 1310
>