Re: Two Photon Microscope Low Signal Troubleshooting

Posted by Guy Cox-2 on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Two-Photon-Microscope-Low-Signal-Troubleshooting-tp7585738p7585749.html

***** To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. *****

In 2-photon microscopy your resolution (FWHM) should be 0.5 * wavelength / (1.414 * NA) .  At 900nm and NA 1.05 this works out at 303nm.  Surely if you are just imaging beads you should be able to do better than 410nm?

 

                                                          Guy

 

Guy Cox, Honorary Associate Professor

School of Medical Sciences

 

Australian Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis,

Madsen, F09, University of Sydney, NSW 2006

 

From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]] On Behalf Of Andreas Bruckbauer
Sent: Thursday, 29 September 2016 5:18 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Two Photon Microscope Low Signal Troubleshooting

 

***** To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to: http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting. *****

@ Andreas:

For the PS Speck beads on a slide, when you say that the image is not too far off the expected values do you mean the expected spatial resolution values of the system?

Yes, I get about 410 nm fwhm in xy and about 1.2 um in z with a 25x 1.05 NA objective when the back aperture is nicely filled. If the z resolution is bad, you might not see small objects but will do just fine imaging larger ones. Also check if you are bleaching the sample before you actually see it, but in this case I would expect a short spike in fluorescence.

Best wishes

Andreas


From: [hidden email]
Sent: ‎29/‎09/‎2016 07:25
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Two Photon Microscope Low Signal Troubleshooting

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Thank you all for your responses.

@ Michael:

Our Ti-Sapphire has 100 fs pulses and is tuned to 900 nm. We use only protected silver mirrors and the following lenses from Thorlabs:

Initial Beam expansion with:

https://www.thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=AC254-030-B
https://www.thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=AC254-060-B

Scan lens: https://www.thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=LSM05-BB
Tube lens: https://www.thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=AC508-400-B

Do you think this would this constitute too many achromats?

@ Craig:

I am measuring power after objective using a power meter from Thorlabs (https://www.thorlabs.com/thorproduct.cfm?partnumber=S121C) held up against output end of the objective.

@ Andreas:

For the PS Speck beads on a slide, when you say that the image is not too far off the expected values do you mean the expected spatial resolution values of the system?