Re: Usefulness of super-resolution?

Posted by Alberto Diaspro on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Usefulness-of-super-resolution-tp7587169p7587172.html

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

well, another example is related to
the mechanisms of inhibitory synaptic plasticity

see: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312204377_Nanoscale_molecular_reorganization_of_the_inhibitory_postsynaptic_density_is_a_determinant_of_GABAergic_synaptic_potentiation
best
alby

> Il giorno 19 ago 2017, alle ore 16:46, Csúcs Gábor <[hidden email]> ha scritto:
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I would have a slightly provocative question to the community: Could you help me to identify significant/major biological discoveries that were clearly dependent on the availability of various super-resolution light microscopy methods? The PNAS paper from the Zhuang lab (2016) about the actin-spectrin ring is a good example for me but I am looking for further ones. Of course, we also use super-resolution techniques in our facility but my observation is that these are used rather to provide "one nice image for a publication" or "another piece in the puzzle of evidences" but they are not "game winners", they were not necessarily the major piece of evidence to prove a biological hypothesis. So I am looking for biological questions that could be answered "only"/mostly by the existing super-resolution methods.
> Thanks a lot for your help!
>
> Greetings Gabor
>