Re: Objective phosphorescence

Posted by Oshel, Philip Eugene on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Objective-phosphorescence-tp7587588p7587609.html

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Is it the glass or the coating?

Phil
-------------
Philip Oshel    
Imaging Facility Director
Biology Department
1304 Biosciences
1455 Calumet Ct.
Central Michigan University
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48859
989 774-3576 office
989 774-7567 lab









-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]> on behalf of Craig Brideau <[hidden email]>
Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]>
Date: Wednesday,  22November, 2017 at 12:09
To: "[hidden email]" <[hidden email]>
Subject: Re: Objective phosphorescence

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

My first instinct was to blame the glue as well, but when Ben mentioned
testing with a singlet I realized it was really the glass. That said, many
optical epoxies are UV cured, so they absorb more at the bluer wavelengths.
I don't know how this would translate into fluorescence or phosphorescence
but you would definitely see more absorption if a lens made liberal use of
such glue in its construction.

Craig

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 1:17 AM, Benjamin E Smith <
[hidden email]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> On thing to note about the glue hypothesis is that the singlet lens (i.e.
> no glue) showed the brightest luminescence.  Also, the glass in optical
> fibers is a whole different beast, where the glass is actually deposited
> via very high purity gasses: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u1DRrAhQJtM
>
> One of my favorite facts about the glass in fibers is that if the ocean was
> as clear as an optical fiber, you could clearly see the bottom.   As was
> suggested by Craig, fused silica lenses should be of a similar purity, so
> they should show a similar low level of luminescence to optical fibers.  If
> I had one floating around I'd try it, but we normally work in the nIR as
> opposed to UV.
>
> -Ben Smith
>
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Gerhard Holst <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > *****
> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> > Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> posting.
> > *****
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > from my experiences with fiber optics and microscopes, I would expect
> that
> > the additional luminescence might come more from the used glue to fix the
> > lenses within the objectives. I guess for manufacturing reasons, to
> reduce
> > the times for polymerization often UV hardening might be used. As long
> as a
> > light beam just passes the lenses, there is only little issue (we are
> using
> > laser light for widefield illumination of the microscope stage, but we
> > don't have issues with such a background), in case the LED light is able
> to
> > be spread within the objective casing, some luminescence might excited
> > within the glue and part of it will be guided through the optical system
> as
> > well.
> >
> > Could the LED light be better shaped, such that I travels mainly through
> > the lenses?
> >
> > with best regards,
> >
> > Gerhard
> >
> >
> > Dr. Gerhard Holst
> > Head of Science & Research
> > +49 (0) 9441 2005 0
> > +49 (0) 172 711 6049
> >
> > PCO AG, Donaupark 11, 93309 Kelheim, Germany, www.pco.de
> > USt. ID-Nr. / VAT: DE128590843, Registergericht / Register court:
> > Regensburg HRB 9157
> > Sitz der Gesellschaft / Registered office: Kelheim, Vorstand / Chairman:
> > Dr. Emil Ott
> > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats / Chairman of the supervisory board:
> Johann
> > Plöb
> >
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[hidden email]]
> > Im Auftrag von Martin Wessendorf
> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. November 2017 00:16
> > An: [hidden email]
> > Betreff: Re: Objective phosphorescence
> >
> > *****
> > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> > Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> posting.
> > *****
> >
> > Interesting.  I was using the widefield 'scope in my lab today and saw
> > something that I've seen a thousand times before, but never thought
> > about: Near-UV excitation causes the optics in my sub-stage condenser to
> > fluoresce yellow.  However, as others have said, I don't know whether the
> > source is the glue, the glass, or the housing.
> >
> > Martin Wessendorf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/20/2017 9:33 PM, Benjamin E Smith wrote:
> > > *****
> > > To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> > > http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> > > Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your
> > posting.
> > > *****
> > >
> > > Hey microscopists,
> > >     We observed an odd phenomenon today on a microscope and was
> > > wondering if anyone else has ever seen it.  We were using a DMD do a
> > > full field flash with 420nm light during the flyback of the scanning
> > > mirror on a 2P imaging rig.  We noticed that after the light was
> > > turned off, there was a millisecond long slewing of the signal that
> > > looked a lot like phosphorescence.  In the following image, you can
> > > see that the LED is on for the first portion of the scan, then turns
> > > off and the apparent
> > > afterglow: https://goo.gl/2ENHwL
> > >
> > > This afterglow was also apparent with an oscilloscope looking at the
> > > PMT and fast mirror signals: https://goo.gl/2AMsvB
> > >
> > >     We then systematically removed components from the optical path,
> > > and cleaned everything, and we were eventually able to determine that
> > > the glass in the objective itself was glowing, where if the objective
> > > was removed and the DMD image was shined onto a piece of lens paper or
> > > metal, the afterglow went away:
> > > https://goo.gl/arXYF5
> > > https://goo.gl/cVo2Ev
> > >
> > >      The final nail in the coffin to our suspicions was when we then
> > > mounted a plano-convex N-BK7 lens onto the microscope and the effect
> > > came back, and the thicker the lens, the stronger the effect. Also,
> > > the effect went away when we used 540nm light.
> > >
> > > With a bit of internet searching I also came across this paper that
> > > confirms there is some visible fluorescence in glass due to trace
> > elements:
> > > http://www.schott.com/d/advanced_optics/87330898-4e56-4d70-965a-3f03c7
> > > bc0c80/1.1/schott_tie-36_fluorescence_of_optical_glass_us.pdf
> > >
> > > Even when I saw the slew, and the first thing that came to mind was
> > > phosphorescence, the last thing that came to mind was that the glass
> > > in the objective itself was the offender, so I wanted to post this to
> > > both give other people a heads-up, and also to see if anyone else has
> > > run into this phenomenon.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >     Ben Smith
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Wessendorf, Ph.D.                   office: (612) 626-0145
> > Assoc Prof, Dept Neuroscience                 lab: (612) 624-2991
> > University of Minnesota             Preferred FAX: (612) 624-8118
> > 6-145 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St. SE    Dept Fax: (612) 626-5009
> > Minneapolis, MN  55455                    e-mail: [hidden email]
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Benjamin E. Smith, Ph. D.
> Imaging Specialist, Vision Science
> University of California, Berkeley
> 195 Life Sciences Addition
> Berkeley, CA  94720-3200
> Tel  (510) 642-9712
> Fax (510) 643-6791
> e-mail: [hidden email]
> http://vision.berkeley.edu/?page_id=5635 <http://vision.berkeley.edu/>
>