http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/Resonant-mirror-noise-tp7588458p7588470.html
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> Post images onhttp://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I was rather referring to an 8 kHz fundamental oscillation. The noise is quite unpleasant - I’d hate to hear the 4 kHz if that’s worse as you say.
>
> Isolation should be possible. Perhaps combined with some foam we’ll arrive at a workable system.
>
> Yes, I assumed the same. Thanks again.
>
> Regards
>
> Rory
>
> …………………………………………………………
>
> Dr. Rory Power
> HFSP Postdoctoral Fellow
> Morgridge Institute for Research
> Medical Engineering | Huisken Lab
> 330 N Orchard St, Madison, WI, 53715
> Tel: 608 316 4554
>
[hidden email]<mailto:
[hidden email]>
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 25, 2018, at 21:18, Michael Giacomelli <
[hidden email]<mailto:
[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> Post images onhttp://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Hi Rory,
>
> 8 KHz unidirectional or bidirectional (so 4 KHz fundamental)? The 8 KHz
> scanners are usually not that bad even at maximum amplitude because the 8
> kHz tone is a lot harder to hear and essentially all the harmonics are out
> of audible range.
>
> For 4 KHz at larger deflection angles you either need hearing protection or
> to really isolate it from the room. A metal box around the scanner and a
> window on the input port so that air cannot pass in/out of the scanner
> helps a lot. This is how most commerical systems work.
>
> I don't think the model matters; the noise comes from pushing air, so for a
> given mirror size and deflection angle the noise power is going to be
> almost constant.
>
> Mike
>
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Power, Rory<
[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy> Post images onhttp://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Hi Confocalists,
>
> We’re trying to circumvent the annoyance of resonant mirrors screaming at
> 8 kHz. I was wondering whether anyone has a recommendation for constructing
> soundproof containment?
>
> Generally were using inexpensive resonant mirrors from EOPC:
>
http://www.eopc.com/sc30.html>
> Also, does anyone know whether the more costly resonant scanners used for
> confocal/multi-photon laser scanning microscopies are any better in this
> regard? Were not hugely concerned with other attributes (simply for light
> sheet microscopy stripe suppression) just the piercing noise.
>
> Many thanks in advance!
>
> Rory
>
> …………………………………………………………
>
> Dr. Rory Power
> Morgridge Institute for Research
> Medical Engineering | Huisken Lab
> 330 N Orchard St, Madison, WI, 53715
> Tel: 608 316 4554
>
[hidden email]<mailto:
[hidden email]>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Martin Wessendorf, Ph.D. office: (612) 626-0145
6-145 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St. SE Dept Fax: (612) 626-5009