Re: General question: Software vs. hardware

Posted by mmodel on
URL: http://confocal-microscopy-list.275.s1.nabble.com/General-question-Software-vs-hardware-tp7589316p7589317.html

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Mike,
Are you talking about deconvolving widefield fluorescence stacks?

Mike Model

-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List <[hidden email]> On Behalf Of Mika Ruonala
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2019 10:44 AM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: General question: Software vs. hardware

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi.
There are software solutions that are able to create image data from wide-field and even microscope systems with seemingly similar quality to that obtained from confocal systems.

The comparison of acquisition vs. software is essentially a comparison of image acquisition vs. image processing. While a software solution is way cheaper than a hardware solution if it is able to produce image data with equal quality why would anyone choose to invest to a confocal anymore?

I’m looking forward to a vidid discussion!

>m